ArticleJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases2018
Factors affectinsg the utilization of Xpert MTB/RIF assay among TB clinic health workers in Addis Ababa.
Article in Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Implementation strategies to increase the uptake and impact of molecular WHO-recommended rapid diagnostic tests: evidence from a mixed-methods systematic review.BMJ global health · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluating the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Tuberculosis Among Health Sciences Students.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Barriers to GeneXpert utilization for tuberculosis detection at a regional referral hospital in Malawi: a qualitative study.The Pan African medical journal · 2025Article
- Tuberculosis care provided by private practitioners in an urban setting in Indonesia: Findings from a standardized patient study.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward tuberculosis prevention and management among household contacts in Suzhou Hospital, Jiangsu province, China.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Knowledge of International Standards for Tuberculosis Care among Private Non-NTP Providers in Lagos, Nigeria: A Cross-Sectional Study.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF is well documented but underutilization is a major challenge in most high burden countries. This appears to be linked with insufficient knowledge of health professionals of using the tool. However, this has not been well studied.
objectiveOur objective was to assess the knowledge of health professionals on Xpert MTB/RIF assay and associated factors in detecting TB/TB drug resistance.
methodsAn institution based cross-sectional study was conducted from April 4 to June 5, 2015, in Addis Ababa that involved 209 healthcare providers working in TB clinics. Structured questionnaire through self-administered interview technique was used to collect the data. We asked them about Xpert on whether they are aware of its place in TB diagnosis, when and for whom it shall be used, its role in treatment monitoring, result interpretation and patient's registration that are diagnosed by Xpert MTB/RIF. We used binary logistic regression analysis to identify associated factors. Odds ratio with 95% CI was computed to assess the strength of the associations.
resultsOf the 209 participants interviewed, the majority 151 (72.2%) were nurses. More than a half of the respondents 114 (54.6%) had poor knowledge. Health professionals with age above 35 years (AOR = 6.253, 95% CI (1.1995, 19.604)) and those who read the Xpert guideline (AOR = 4.231, 95% CI (2.011, 8.900)) were more likely to have good knowledge on Xpert. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: This study revealed that the overall magnitude of knowledge status was found to be low. Health workers above 35 years and those who read the guideline on Xpert had higher knowledge status on Xpert. Distribution of national guideline on Xpert and assigning experienced clinicians in TB DOTs clinics are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.