Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31720189›Full record

ArticleCureus2019

The Association between Body Mass Index and Vitamin D Supplement Use among Adults in the United States.

Carlos Orces

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Vitamin D Status and Dyslipidaemia Among Obese Individuals in Ibadan, Nigeria: A Pilot Study.Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Vitamin D testing in pharmacies: Results of a federal screening campaign.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Food-based strategies for prevention of vitamin D deficiency as informed by vitamin D dietary guidelines, and consideration of minimal-risk UVB radiation exposure in future guidelines.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carlos OrcesRheumatology, Laredo Medical Center, Laredo, USA.
Laredo Community College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Obesity has been consistently associated with lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations. BMI status also has a major impact on 25(OH)D levels among vitamin D supplement users. In our cross-sectional study, we aimed to discuss the prevalence of vitamin D supplement use and its effect on 25(OH)D levels according to BMI status among US adults. Methods The present analysis was based on data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cycles 2011-2012 through 2013-2014. The prevalence of vitamin D supplement use according to BMI status among subjects aged 20 years and older by selected characteristics was analyzed. Logistic regression models were assembled to examine the independent association of BMI status and vitamin D supplement use. Similarly, general linear models were used to assess the effect of daily vitamin D supplementation doses (<400 IU, 400-800 IU, and >800 IU) on 25(OH)D concentrations according to BMI status. Results Of 10,076 participants with a mean age of 47.2 [standard error (SE): 0.4] years, 57.5% (SE: 1.7) of normal-weight and 63.5% (SE: 0.9) of obese subjects reported not taking vitamin D supplements over the previous 30 days. After adjustment for potential confounders, obese subjects were 1.3 times more likely to be nonusers of vitamin D supplements and were 24% less likely to take vitamin D supplements ≥400 IU/day compared with their normal-weight counterparts. In addition, significant differences in mean 25(OH)D levels of vitamin D supplementation doses were consistently seen across BMI categories. Indeed, obese and overweight participants taking >800 IU/day of vitamin D supplements had 15.5 and 8.1 nmol/L lower mean concentrations of 25(OH)D than their normal-weight counterparts on average, respectively. Conclusion Obese subjects had a lower prevalence of vitamin D supplement use compared with their normal-weight counterparts. This nutritional disparity may also contribute to low 25(OH)D concentrations seen in obesity. However, a daily vitamin D supplement intake between 400 IU and 800 IU appears to be adequate among obese subjects to achieve optimal 25(OH) levels.

Indexed as

obesitysupplementsvitamin d

Identifiers

PMID31720189
PMCPMC6823089
OpenAlexW2974918601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.