Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31720159›Full record

ReviewCureus2019

Comparison of Lumbar Laminectomy Alone, Lumbar Laminectomy and Fusion, Stand-alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Stand-alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Review of the Literature.

Manan Shah, Bradley Kolb, Emre Yilmaz, Dia R Halalmeh, Marc D Moisi

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Laminectomy vs Fusion for Intradural Extramedullary Tumors.International journal of spine surgery · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Wnt/Stem cells international · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Manan ShahNeurosurgery, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA.
Bradley KolbNeurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA.
Emre YilmazSurgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, USA.
Dia R HalalmehNeurosurgery, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA.
Marc D MoisiNeurosurgery, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA.
Detroit Medical Center · USRush University Medical Center · USSwedish Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lumbar spinal stenosis is defined as narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal, which causes compression of the spinal cord and nerves. Spinal stenosis can cause leg pain and potentially back pain that can affect the quality of life. Ultimately, surgical decompression is required to alleviate the symptoms. In this review, we first utilize several important studies to compare lumbar laminectomy alone versus lumbar laminectomy and fusion. We also compare the effectiveness of more novel surgical approaches, stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), and stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). These techniques have their own advantages and disadvantages in which many factors must be taken into account before choosing a surgical approach. In addition, the patient's anatomy and pathology, lifestyle, and desires should be analyzed to help determine the ideal surgical strategy.

Indexed as

anterior lumbar interbody fusionlateral lumbar interbody fusionlumbar laminectomylumbar spine fusionlumbar stenosisspine

Identifiers

PMID31720159
PMCPMC6823012
OpenAlexW2973632344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.