Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31720122›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Genomics of host-pathogen interactions: challenges and opportunities across ecological and spatiotemporal scales.

Kathrin Näpflin, Emily A O'Connor, Lutz Becks, Staffan Bensch, Vincenzo A Ellis, Nina Hafer-Hahmann, Karin C Harding, Sara K Lindén, Morten T Olsen, Jacob Roved and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Host-pathogen protein-nucleic acid interactions: A comprehensive review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Comparative genomics in infectious disease.Current opinion in microbiology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Kathrin NäpflinDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Emily A O'ConnorMolecular Ecology and Evolution Lab, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Lutz BecksAquatic Ecology and Evolution, Limnological Institute University Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Staffan BenschMolecular Ecology and Evolution Lab, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Vincenzo A EllisMolecular Ecology and Evolution Lab, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Nina Hafer-HahmannDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.
Karin C HardingDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sara K LindénDepartment of Medical Chemistry and Cell Biology, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Morten T OlsenSection for Evolutionary Genomics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jacob RovedMolecular Ecology and Evolution Lab, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Timothy B SacktonInformatics Group, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Allison J ShultzOrnithology Department, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Vignesh VenkatakrishnanDepartment of Medical Chemistry and Cell Biology, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Elin VidevallMolecular Ecology and Evolution Lab, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Helena WesterdahlMolecular Ecology and Evolution Lab, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jamie C WinternitzDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.
Scott V EdwardsDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Lund University · SEChalmers University of Technology · SEHarvard University · USUniversity of Gothenburg · SEBielefeld University · DENational Zoological Park · USNatural History Museum of Los Angeles County · USSwiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology · CHUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Konstanz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary genomics has recently entered a new era in the study of host-pathogen interactions. A variety of novel genomic techniques has transformed the identification, detection and classification of both hosts and pathogens, allowing a greater resolution that helps decipher their underlying dynamics and provides novel insights into their environmental context. Nevertheless, many challenges to a general understanding of host-pathogen interactions remain, in particular in the synthesis and integration of concepts and findings across a variety of systems and different spatiotemporal and ecological scales. In this perspective we aim to highlight some of the commonalities and complexities across diverse studies of host-pathogen interactions, with a focus on ecological, spatiotemporal variation, and the choice of genomic methods used. We performed a quantitative review of recent literature to investigate links, patterns and potential tradeoffs between the complexity of genomic, ecological and spatiotemporal scales undertaken in individual host-pathogen studies. We found that the majority of studies used whole genome resolution to address their research objectives across a broad range of ecological scales, especially when focusing on the pathogen side of the interaction. Nevertheless, genomic studies conducted in a complex spatiotemporal context are currently rare in the literature. Because processes of host-pathogen interactions can be understood at multiple scales, from molecular-, cellular-, and physiological-scales to the levels of populations and ecosystems, we conclude that a major obstacle for synthesis across diverse host-pathogen systems is that data are collected on widely diverging scales with different degrees of resolution. This disparity not only hampers effective infrastructural organization of the data but also data granularity and accessibility. Comprehensive metadata deposited in association with genomic data in easily accessible databases will allow greater inference across systems in the future, especially when combined with open data standards and practices. The standardization and comparability of such data will facilitate early detection of emerging infectious diseases as well as studies of the impact of anthropogenic stressors, such as climate change, on disease dynamics in humans and wildlife.

Indexed as

Anthropogenic stressorsCo-evolutionEpidemiological surveillanceGWASImmunotoxinsInfectious diseasesMHCMucusNatural selectionPlasmodium

Identifiers

PMID31720122
PMCPMC6839515
OpenAlexW2951719439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.