Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31719949›Full record

ArticleCraniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction2019

The Comprehensive AO CMF Classification System for Mandibular Fractures: A Multicenter Validation Study.

Paul A Mittermiller, Serena S Bidwell, Florian M Thieringer, Carl-Peter Cornelius, Amber W Trickey, Risto Kontio, Sabine Girod, and the AO Trauma Classification Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Revision Surgery With Refixation After Mandibular Fractures.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. AO Craniomaxillofacial Surgery (AO CMF): A World of Opportunities.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paul A MittermillerStanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research and Education (S-SPIRE) Center, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0002-0652-2745
Serena S BidwellStanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research and Education (S-SPIRE) Center, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0002-9655-5697
Florian M ThieringerDepartment of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Basel-Stadt, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3035-9308
Carl-Peter CorneliusDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Facial Plastic Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Amber W TrickeyStanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research and Education (S-SPIRE) Center, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0001-9993-3860
Risto KontioDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Sabine GirodStanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research and Education (S-SPIRE) Center, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0002-6974-6076
and the AO Trauma Classification Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The AO CMF has recently launched the first comprehensive classification system for craniomaxillofacial (CMF) fractures. The AO CMF classification system uses a hierarchical framework with three levels of growing complexity (levels 1, 2, and 3). Level 1 of the system identifies the presence of fractures in four anatomic areas (mandible, midface, skull base, and cranial vault). Level 2 variables describe the location of the fractures within those defined areas. Level 3 variables describe details of fracture morphology such as fragmentation, displacement, and dislocation. This multiplanar radiographic image-based AO CMF trauma classification system is constantly evolving and beginning to enter worldwide application. A validation of the system is mandatory prior to a reliable communication and data processing in clinical and research environments. This interobserver reliability and accuracy study is aiming to validate the three current modules of the AO CMF classification system for mandible trauma in adults. To assess the performance of the system at the different precision levels, it focuses on the fracture location within the mandibular regions and condylar process subregions as core components giving only secondary attention to morphologic variables. A total of 15 subjects individually assigned the location and features of mandibular fractures in 200 CT scans using the AO CMF classification system. The results of these ratings were then statistically evaluated for interobserver reliability by Fleiss' kappa and accuracy by percentage agreement with an experienced reference assessor. The scores were used to determine if the variables of levels 2 and 3 were appropriate tools for valid classification. Interobserver reliability and accuracy were compared by hierarchy of variables (level 2 vs. level 3), by anatomical region and subregion, and by assessor experience level using Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon's rank-sum tests. The AO CMF classification system was determined to be reliable and accurate for classifying mandibular fractures for most levels 2 and 3 variables. Level 2 variables had significantly higher interobserver reliability than level 3 variables (median kappa: 0.69 vs. 0.59,

Indexed as

classificationcomputed tomographyfracturesinterobserver reliabilitymandibular fracturesmidfacevalidation

Identifiers

PMID31719949
PMCPMC6839979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.