Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31719914›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular bioengineering2019

Dynamic Model of Protease State and Inhibitor Trafficking to Predict Protease Activity in Breast Cancer Cells.

W Andrew Shockey, Christopher A Kieslich, Catera L Wilder, Valencia Watson, Manu O Platt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular bioengineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 59% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chemiluminescent probes for imaging cysteine cathepsin activity.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters · 2026
    Article
  2. Synthetic living materials in cancer biology.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W Andrew ShockeyWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology & Emory University, 950 Atlantic Drive, Suite 3015, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA.
Christopher A KieslichWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology & Emory University, 950 Atlantic Drive, Suite 3015, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA.
Catera L WilderWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology & Emory University, 950 Atlantic Drive, Suite 3015, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA.
Valencia WatsonWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology & Emory University, 950 Atlantic Drive, Suite 3015, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA.
Manu O PlattWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology & Emory University, 950 Atlantic Drive, Suite 3015, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6390-4320
Georgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Multiscale, mechanistic, and predictive models of stroke in sickle cell diseaseDP2OD007433 · OD · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI PLATT, MANU O · 2010 to 2010
$2.3M
NIH HHS DP2 OD007433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCysteine cathepsins are implicated in breast cancer progression, produced by both transformed epithelial cells and infiltrated stromal cells in tumors, but to date, no cathepsin inhibitor has been approved for clinical use due to unexpected side effects. This study explores cellular feedback to cathepsin inhibitors that might yield non-intuitive responses, and uses computational models to determine underlying cathepsin-inhibitor dynamics.

methodsMDA-MB-231 cells treated with E64 were tested by multiplex cathepsin zymography and immunoblotting to quantify total, active, and inactive cathepsins S and L. This data was used to parameterize mathematical models of intracellular free and inhibited cathepsins, and then applied to a dynamic model predicting cathepsin responses to other classes of cathepsin inhibitors that have also failed clinical trials.

resultsE64 treated cells exhibited increased amounts of active cathepsin S and reduced amount of active cathepsin L, although E64 binds tightly to both. This inhibitor response was not unique to cancer cells or any one cell type, suggesting an underlying fundamental mechanism of E64 preserving activity of cathepsin S, but not cathepsin L. Computational models were able to predict and differentiate between inhibitor-bound, active, and inactive cathepsin species and demonstrate how different classes of cathepsin inhibitors can have drastically divergent effects on active cathepsins located in different intracellular compartments.

conclusionsTogether, this work has important implications for the development of mathematical model systems for protease inhibition in tissue destructive diseases, and consideration of preservation mechanisms by inhibitors that could alter perceived benefits of these treatment modalities.

Indexed as

CancerCathepsinsClinical trialsMathematicalZymography

Identifiers

PMID31719914
PMCPMC6816728
OpenAlexW2950347856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.