Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31719899›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular bioengineering2019

Ciliotherapy Treatments to Enhance Biochemically- and Biophysically-Induced Mesenchymal Stem Cell Osteogenesis: A Comparison Study.

M A Corrigan, T M Ferradaes, M Riffault, D A Hoey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular bioengineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanosignaling in Osteoporosis: When Cells Feel the Force.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Role of Primary Cilia in Skeletal Disorders.Stem cells international · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

M A CorriganTrinity Centre for Bioengineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College, Dublin, D02 R590 Ireland.
T M FerradaesTrinity Centre for Bioengineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College, Dublin, D02 R590 Ireland.
M RiffaultTrinity Centre for Bioengineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College, Dublin, D02 R590 Ireland.
D A HoeyTrinity Centre for Bioengineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College, Dublin, D02 R590 Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5898-0409
Trinity College · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNew approaches to treat osteoporosis have focused on promoting bone formation through the targeting of osteoblasts and their progenitors, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). The primary cilium is a singular cellular extension known to play an important role in biochemical and biophysical osteogenic induction of MSCs. Defects in ciliary structure have been associated with a plethora of diseases. Therefore targeting the cilium therapeutically (ciliotherapies) has emerged as a potential new treatment modality. Therefore, this study performed a comparison analysis on known ciliotherapies and their potential effects in mediating MSC osteogenic differentiation.

methodsMSCs were treated with forskolin, lithium chloride (LiCl) or fenoldopam to investigate the effect on ciliogenesis and cilia-associated signalling. Moreover, both early and long term biochemical and biophysical (fluid shear) induced osteogenic differentiation was examined in terms of osteogenic gene expression and bone matrix deposition following each treatment.

resultsLiCl and fenoldopam were found to enhance MSC ciliogenesis to a similar degree. LiCl significantly altered hedgehog (HH) and Wnt signalling which was associated with inhibited osteogenic gene expression, while fenoldopam demonstrated enhanced early osteogenesis. Long term treatment with both ciliotherapies did not enhance osteogenesis, however LiCl had detrimental effects on cell viability. Intriguingly both ciliotherapies enhanced MSC mechanosensitivity as demonstrated by augmented osteogenic gene expression in response to fluid shear, which over longer durations resulted in enhanced matrix deposition per cell.

conclusionsTherefore, ciliotherapies can be utilised to enhance MSC ciliogenesis resulting in enhanced mechanosensitivity, however, only fenoldopam is a viable ciliotherapeutic option to enhance MSC osteogenesis.

Indexed as

BoneHedgehogMechanobiologyOscillatory fluid shearPrimary ciliumWnt

Identifiers

PMID31719899
PMCPMC6816767
OpenAlexW2901244524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.