Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31719804›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology

Detailed analysis of dose difference in using water as tissue-equivalent material in

Izadi Vasafi Gholamhossein, Mehdi Firoozabadi Mohammad, Ghorbani Mahdi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Izadi Vasafi GholamhosseinDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran.
Mehdi Firoozabadi MohammadDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran.
Ghorbani MahdiBiomedical Engineering and Medical Physics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
University of Birjand · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe purpose of this study is to analyse how small variations in the elemental composition of soft tissue lead to differences in dose distributions from a

backgroundWater is normally used as a tissue-equivalent phantom material in radiotherapy dosimetry. MATERIALS AND

methodsNeutron energy spectra, neutron and gamma-ray dose rate distributions were calculated for a

resultsThe obtained results showed differences between total dose rates in various tissues relative to water varying between zero and 4.94%. The contributions of neutron and total gamma ray doses to these differences are, on average, 81% and 19%, respectively. It was found that the dose differences between various soft tissues and water depend not only on the soft tissue composition, but also on the beam type emitted from the

conclusionAssuming water as a tissue-equivalent material, although leads to overestimation of dose rate (except in the case of adipose tissue), is acceptable and suitable for use in

Indexed as

252CfBrachytherapyDose distributionTissue composition

Identifiers

PMID31719804
PMCPMC6838967
OpenAlexW2984284150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.