Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31719709›Full record

ArticleBioscience2019

A Worm's World: Ecological Flexibility Pays Off for Free-Living Nematodes in Sediments and Soils.

Michaela Schratzberger, Martijn Holterman, Dick van Oevelen, Johannes Helder

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Helminth fauna ofHelminthologia · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Journal of nematology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michaela SchratzbergerCentre for Environment, Fisheries, and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4973-6698
Martijn HoltermanLaboratory of Nematology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Dick van OevelenRoyal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Yerseke.
Johannes HelderLaboratory of Nematology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0408-3985
Wageningen University & Research · NLCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science · GBRoyal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Free-living nematodes, an ancient animal phylum of unsegmented microscopic roundworms, have successfully adapted to nearly every ecosystem on Earth: from marine and freshwater to land, from the polar regions to the tropics, and from the mountains to the ocean depths. They are globally the most abundant animals in sediments and soils. In the present article, we identify the factors that collectively explain the successful ecological proliferation of free-living nematodes and demonstrate the impact they have on vital sediment and soil processes. The ecological success of nematodes is strongly linked to their ability to feed on various food sources that are present in both sediments and soils, and to proliferate rapidly and survive in contrasting environmental conditions. The adaptations, roles, and behaviors of free-living nematodes have important implications for the resilience of sediments and soils, and for emergent animal communities responding to human alterations to ecosystems worldwide.

Indexed as

adaptabilityecological successfree-living nematodessedimentssoils

Identifiers

PMID31719709
PMCPMC6829015
OpenAlexW2972235271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.