ArticleLeukemia2020
Molecular characterization of a second myeloid neoplasm developing after treatment for acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Leukemia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pre-diagnostic clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential among patients with a primary cancer and risk of second cancers.Leukemia · 2026Article
- [Effect of clonal hematopoiesis in remission on hematopoiesis recovery in patients with NPM1 mutated acute myeloid leukemia after chemotherapy].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2023Article
- Mitochondria and Their Relationship with Common Genetic Abnormalities in Hematologic Malignancies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Article
- Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation overcomes the poor prognosis in MLL-rearranged solid tumor therapy related-acute myeloid leukemia.American journal of cancer research · 2021Article
- Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutations in Myelodysplastic Syndromes and in Acute Myeloid Leukemias.Cancers · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (tMN) following successful treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are rare and poorly characterized. To evaluate the presence of a common ancestral clone, we performed whole-exome sequencing of 25 patients at AML diagnosis, tMN diagnosis (tMDS: 13; tAML: 12), and matched remission samples, identifying 607 mutations affecting 504 different genes (46 recurrently mutated). Number of mutations was higher in tAML vs. tMDS cases (median 19 vs 13 mutations, p = 0.05). Focusing on 24 genes commonly mutated in hematological malignancies, 19/25 (76%) patients were found to share mutations between AML and tMN, mostly affecting epigenetic modifiers (21/32; 66%), splicing factors (6/32; 19%), and chromatin modifiers (3/32; 9%). Analysis of remission samples identified 13 persisting mutations in 10/22 patients, affecting DNMT3A (n = 6), TET2 (n = 5), IDH1 and SRSF2 (n = 1, each). Comparison of cytogenetics revealed that 9/12 patients with a normal karyotype (NK) in AML harbored aberrations in tMN, four aberrant AML cases presented with NK in tMN, four other patients showed unrelated cytogenetic aberrations. Our study provides novel insights into the pathogenesis of tMN, hypothesizing the presence of a common ancestral clone in AML and tMN. Mutations mostly affected epigenetic modifiers, which have previously been linked to clonal hematopoiesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.