ArticleEye (London, England)2020
Longitudinal neovascular changes on optical coherence tomography angiography in proliferative diabetic retinopathy treated with panretinal photocoagulation alone versus with intravitreal conbercept plus panretinal photocoagulation: a pilot study.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrative Management of High-Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: Precision Diagnostics via Ultra-Widefield Imaging and Therapeutic Strategies.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025Review
- OCT angiography and its retinal biomarkers [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2023Review
- Comparison of widefield swept-source optical coherence tomographic angiography and fluorescein fundus angiography for detection of retinal neovascularization with diabetic retinopathy.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Observational
- Management of acute proliferative diabetic retinopathy related complications during the first COVID-19 wave.BMC ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Perspectives on diabetic retinopathy from advanced retinal vascular imaging.Eye (London, England) · 2022Review
- Update on Optical Coherence Tomography and Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Imaging in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Characterizing Flow and Structure of Diabetic Retinal Neovascularization after Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography: A Pilot Study.Journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Near-infrared reflectance imaging of neovascularization in proliferative diabetic retinopathy.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2020Article
- Optical coherence tomography features of neovascularization in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the longitudinal changes in neovascularization of the retinal elsewhere (NVE) size on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) treated by panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) alone or by single intravitreal conbercept injection plus PRP.
methodsA prospective pilot study. Forty-four PDR eyes with NVE confirmed by fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and OCTA were included. They were assigned to receive PRP alone (PRP group) or intravitreal conbercept injection plus PRP (combination group). Ophthalmic examinations, including BCVA and OCTA to measure the NVE size, were performed at baseline before each PRP session, and at 1, 3, and 6 months.
resultsTwenty-nine eyes were included in the PRP group, and 15 eyes were included in the combination group. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to age, BCVA, and NVE area at baseline. In both groups, there was a significant (P < 0.05) NVE size reduction during the majority of study visits, with the reduction observed in the combination group significantly larger than that in the PRP group. No significant BCVA changes were observed in either groups, except that in the PRP group, the BCVA at 3 months was significantly improved (P < 0.05). No deaths or unexpected adverse events (AEs) were reported.
conclusionsIntravitreal conbercept plus PRP was more effective than PRP monotherapy in NVE regression. Precise quantification of the NVE area by OCTA makes it a useful tool for monitoring the response of retinal neovascular lesions to the therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.