Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31719539›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

SeeTB: A novel alternative to sputum smear microscopy to diagnose tuberculosis in high burden countries.

Vikas Pandey, Pooja Singh, Saumya Singh, Naresh Arora, Neha Quadir, Saurabh Singh, Ayan Das, Mridu Dudeja, Prem Kapur, Nasreen Zafar Ehtesham and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Learning from COVID-19 to tackle TB pandemic: From despair to hope.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Vikas PandeyIndian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Pooja SinghIndian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Saumya SinghIndian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Naresh AroraIndian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Neha QuadirNational Institute of Pathology, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Saurabh SinghIndian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Ayan DasJamia Hamdard, Hamdard Nagar, New Delhi, 110062, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9451-2434
Mridu DudejaJamia Hamdard, Hamdard Nagar, New Delhi, 110062, India.
Prem KapurJamia Hamdard, Hamdard Nagar, New Delhi, 110062, India.
Nasreen Zafar EhteshamNational Institute of Pathology, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Ravikrishnan ElangovanIndian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, 110016, India. rke.iitd@gmail.com.
Seyed E HasnainIndian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, 110016, India. sehiitd@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microscopy-based tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis i.e. Ziehl-Neelsen screening still remains the primary diagnostic method in resource poor and high TB burden countries, however this method has poor sensitivity (~60%). Bringing three million TB patients who are left undiagnosed under the treatment has been a major focus as part of END-TB strategy across the world. We have developed a portable set-up called 'SeeTB' that converts a bright-field microscope into fluorescence microscope (FM) with minimal interventions. SeeTB, a total internal reflection-based fluorescence excitation system allows visualization of auramine-O stained bacilli efficiently with high signal-to-noise ratio. Along with the device, we have developed a sputum-processing reagent called 'CLR' that homogenizes and digests the viscous polymer matrix of sputum. We have compared the performance of SeeTB system in 237 clinical sputum samples along with FM, GeneXpert and liquid culture. In comparison with culture as gold standard, FM has sensitivity of 63.77% and SeeTB has improved sensitivity to 76.06%. In comparison with GeneXpert, FM has sensitivity of 73.91% while SeeTB has improved sensitivity to 85.51%. However, there is no significant change in the specificity between FM and SeeTB system. In short, SeeTB system offers the most realistic option for improved TB case identification in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

BenzophenoneidumDiagnostic EquipmentDiagnostic Tests, RoutineEarly DiagnosisEquipment DesignHumansMaleMicroscopy, FluorescenceMycobacterium tuberculosisSensitivity and SpecificitySputumTuberculosisBenzophenoneidum

Identifiers

PMID31719539
PMCPMC6851358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.