Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31719536›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Community-level respiration of prokaryotic microbes may rise with global warming.

Thomas P Smith, Thomas J H Thomas, Bernardo García-Carreras, Sofía Sal, Gabriel Yvon-Durocher, Thomas Bell, Samrāt Pawar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Constrained Forest Methane Sink by Thermal Adaptation of Soil Methanotrophs.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas P SmithDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK. thomas.smith1@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4038-9722
Thomas J H ThomasDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK.
Bernardo García-CarrerasDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK.
Sofía SalDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK.
Gabriel Yvon-DurocherEnvironment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9EZ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1749-3417
Thomas BellDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2615-3932
Samrāt PawarDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK. s.pawar@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8375-5684
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J014575/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how the metabolic rates of prokaryotes respond to temperature is fundamental to our understanding of how ecosystem functioning will be altered by climate change, as these micro-organisms are major contributors to global carbon efflux. Ecological metabolic theory suggests that species living at higher temperatures evolve higher growth rates than those in cooler niches due to thermodynamic constraints. Here, using a global prokaryotic dataset, we find that maximal growth rate at thermal optimum increases with temperature for mesophiles (temperature optima [Formula: see text]C), but not thermophiles ([Formula: see text]C). Furthermore, short-term (within-day) thermal responses of prokaryotic metabolic rates are typically more sensitive to warming than those of eukaryotes. Because climatic warming will mostly impact ecosystems in the mesophilic temperature range, we conclude that as microbial communities adapt to higher temperatures, their metabolic rates and therefore, biomass-specific CO[Formula: see text] production, will inevitably rise. Using a mathematical model, we illustrate the potential global impacts of these findings.

Indexed as

Global WarmingAdaptation, PhysiologicalAerobiosisBacteriaCarbonEcosystemProkaryotic CellsTemperatureCarbon

Identifiers

PMID31719536
PMCPMC6851113
OpenAlexW2985374659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.