Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31719240›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2020

Neuronal and peripheral damages induced by synthetic psychoactive substances: an update of recent findings from human and animal studies.

Giulia Costa, Maria Antonietta De Luca, Gessica Piras, Jacopo Marongiu, Liana Fattore, Nicola Simola

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Editorial: The toxicology of drugs of abuse.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Use and abuse of dissociative and psychedelic drugs in adolescence.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giulia CostaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Maria Antonietta De LucaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences; National Institute of Neuroscience (INN), University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Gessica PirasDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Jacopo MarongiuDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Liana FattoreNational Research Council of Italy, Institute of Neuroscience, Cagliari, Italy.
Nicola SimolaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences; National Institute of Neuroscience (INN), University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
University of Cagliari · ITNational Research Council · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preclinical and clinical studies indicate that synthetic psychoactive substances, in addition to having abuse potential, may elicit toxic effects of varying severity at the peripheral and central levels. Nowadays, toxicity induced by synthetic psychoactive substances poses a serious harm for health, since recreational use of these substances is on the rise among young and adult people. The present review summarizes recent findings on the peripheral and central toxicity elicited by "old" and "new" synthetic psychoactive substances in humans and experimental animals, focusing on amphetamine derivatives, hallucinogen and dissociative drugs and synthetic cannabinoids.

Indexed as

cannabinoidsdissociativeshallucinogensketamineMDMAmethamphetaminemethoxetamineneuroinflammationneurotoxicityNPS

Identifiers

PMID31719240
PMCPMC6990793
OpenAlexW2984514911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.