Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31719091›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Interventions for pregnant women who use tobacco and other substances: a systematic review protocol.

Melissa A Jackson, Amanda L Baker, Kristen L McCarter, Amanda L Brown, Gillian S Gould, Adrian J Dunlop

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Tobacco Smoking during Pregnancy: Women's Perception about the Usefulness of Smoking Cessation Interventions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa A JacksonSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia Mel.Jackson@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0002-1491-6218
Amanda L BakerSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3328-7146
Kristen L McCarterSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2638-6381
Amanda L BrownSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0405-0713
Gillian S GouldSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8489-2576
Adrian J DunlopSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2394-5966
Hunter New England Local Health District · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe prevalence of tobacco smoking in pregnancy remains elevated in some disadvantaged populations of women. One group is those who use alcohol and/or other psychoactive substances during pregnancy, with tobacco use prevalence estimates ranging from 71% to 95%. Although effective evidence-based cessation treatments exist, few women with co-occurring substance use problems successfully stop smoking during pregnancy. There is limited information about treatments that specifically target this group and a summary of the available research is required to assist and enhance the development of innovative cessation interventions. This article describes a protocol for a comprehensive review of studies that have trialled behavioural and/or pharmacological tobacco cessation interventions in populations of pregnant women who are nicotine dependent and use alcohol and/or other psychoactive substances. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The review will undertake literature searches in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE and ProQuest databases, as well as the grey literature. Studies of any design methodology will be included if they describe changes to tobacco smoking behaviours in quantitative terms. No restriction on year of publication or published language will apply. Participants include pregnant women of any age, who smoke tobacco, who are seeking or having treatment, or in post-treatment recovery for the use of psychoactive substances. Interventions are any psychological, behavioural or pharmacological treatments used to treat tobacco use. Outcome measures are any that quantitatively report abstinence or reductions in participant tobacco consumption. Key details and tobacco-related outcomes from included studies will be extracted and tabulated before being narratively synthesised. The systematic review protocol has been developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed literature, conference presentations, media and social media. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018108777.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsSubstance-Related DisordersSystematic Reviews as Topicdisadvantaged populationspregnancysmoking cessationsubstance use disordertobacco use disorder

Identifiers

PMID31719091
PMCPMC6858244
OpenAlexW2983985291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.