Trial reportBMJ open2019
Perineural local anaesthetic catheter after major lower limb amputation trial (PLACEMENT): results from a randomised controlled feasibility trial.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes following major dysvascular lower limb amputation: an updated systematic review.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Perioperative Pain Management for Major Limb Amputation - A Systematic-Narrative Hybrid Review.Current pain and headache reports · 2025Pooled it
- Frailty score and outcomes of patients undergoing vascular surgery and amputation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- Exploring patients' experiences of analgesia after major lower limb amputation: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2021Trial
- Preventive Approach to Phantom Limb Pain in Lower Limb Ablation Surgery: A Systematic Review.Orthopedic reviews · 2025Article
- The Role of Preemptive Perioperative Analgesia in Prevention of Chronic Phantom Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Review
- [Perioperative measures for prevention of phantom pain: an evidence-based approach to risk reduction].Der Anaesthesist · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the feasibility of undertaking a randomised controlled effectiveness trial evaluating the use of a perineural catheter (PNC) after major lower limb amputation with postoperative pain as the primary outcome.
designRandomised controlled feasibility trial.
settingTwo vascular Centres in South Wales, UK.
participants50 patients scheduled for major lower limb amputation (below or above knee) for complications of peripheral vascular disease.
interventionsThe treatment arm received a PNC placed adjacent to the sciatic or tibial nerve at the time of surgery, with continuous infusion of levobupivacaine hydrochloride 0.125% for up to 5 days. The control arm received neither local anaesthetic nor PNC. Both arms received usual perioperative anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were the proportion of eligible patients who were randomised and the proportion of recruited patients who provided primary effectiveness outcome data. Secondary outcomes were: the proportion of recruited patients reaching 2 and 6 month follow-up and supplying pain data; identification of key cost drivers; development of an economic analysis framework for a future effectiveness trial; identification of barriers to recruitment and site set-up; and identification of the best way to measure postoperative pain.
resultsSeventy-six of 103 screened patients were deemed eligible over a 10 month period. Fifty (64.5%) of these patients were randomised, with one excluded in the perioperative period. Forty-five (91.3%) of 49 recruited patients provided enough pain scores on a 4-point verbal rating scale to allow primary effectiveness outcome evaluation. Attrition rates were high; 18 patients supplied data at 6 month follow-up. Costs were dominated by length of hospital stay. Patients and healthcare professionals reported that trial processes were acceptable.
conclusionsRecruitment of patients into a trial comparing PNC use to usual care after major lower limb amputation with postoperative pain measured on a 4-point verbal rating scale is feasible. Evaluation of longer-term symptoms is difficult. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN: 85 710 690. EudraCT: 2016-003544-37.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.