Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31719071›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2019

Perineural local anaesthetic catheter after major lower limb amputation trial (PLACEMENT): results from a randomised controlled feasibility trial.

David C Bosanquet, Graeme K Ambler, Cherry-Ann Waldron, Emma Thomas-Jones, Lucy Brookes-Howell, Mark Kelson, Timothy Pickles, Debbie Harris, Sarah Milosevic, Deborah Fitzsimmons and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

David C Bosanquet *Department of Vascular Surgery, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, UK davebosanquet@hotmail.com.
Graeme K Ambler *Department of Vascular Surgery, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, UK.
Cherry-Ann WaldronCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Emma Thomas-JonesCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Lucy Brookes-HowellCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Mark KelsonDepartment of Mathematics, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Timothy PicklesCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Debbie HarrisCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Sarah MilosevicCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Deborah FitzsimmonsSwansea Centre for Health Economics, College of Human Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Neeraj SaxenaDepartment of Anaesthetics, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Cwm Taf University Health Board, Abercynon, UK.
Christopher P TwineDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, UK.
Cardiff University · GBAneurin Bevan University Health Board · GBPhysical Sciences (United States) · USRoyal Glamorgan Hospital · GBSwansea University · GB

Funding

HCRW_ RFPPB-16-1198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the feasibility of undertaking a randomised controlled effectiveness trial evaluating the use of a perineural catheter (PNC) after major lower limb amputation with postoperative pain as the primary outcome.

designRandomised controlled feasibility trial.

settingTwo vascular Centres in South Wales, UK.

participants50 patients scheduled for major lower limb amputation (below or above knee) for complications of peripheral vascular disease.

interventionsThe treatment arm received a PNC placed adjacent to the sciatic or tibial nerve at the time of surgery, with continuous infusion of levobupivacaine hydrochloride 0.125% for up to 5 days. The control arm received neither local anaesthetic nor PNC. Both arms received usual perioperative anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were the proportion of eligible patients who were randomised and the proportion of recruited patients who provided primary effectiveness outcome data. Secondary outcomes were: the proportion of recruited patients reaching 2 and 6 month follow-up and supplying pain data; identification of key cost drivers; development of an economic analysis framework for a future effectiveness trial; identification of barriers to recruitment and site set-up; and identification of the best way to measure postoperative pain.

resultsSeventy-six of 103 screened patients were deemed eligible over a 10 month period. Fifty (64.5%) of these patients were randomised, with one excluded in the perioperative period. Forty-five (91.3%) of 49 recruited patients provided enough pain scores on a 4-point verbal rating scale to allow primary effectiveness outcome evaluation. Attrition rates were high; 18 patients supplied data at 6 month follow-up. Costs were dominated by length of hospital stay. Patients and healthcare professionals reported that trial processes were acceptable.

conclusionsRecruitment of patients into a trial comparing PNC use to usual care after major lower limb amputation with postoperative pain measured on a 4-point verbal rating scale is feasible. Evaluation of longer-term symptoms is difficult. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN: 85 710 690. EudraCT: 2016-003544-37.

Indexed as

Amputation, SurgicalAdultAmputation StumpsAnesthesia, LocalAnesthetics, LocalDrug Administration ScheduleFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPhantom LimbPostoperative PainSeverity of Illness IndexAnesthetics, Localamputationpainperineural

Identifiers

PMID31719071
PMCPMC6858124
OpenAlexW2988126378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.