Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31719028›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

Health Researchers' Use of Social Media: Scoping Review.

Justine Dol, Perri R Tutelman, Christine T Chambers, Melanie Barwick, Emily K Drake, Jennifer A Parker, Robin Parker, Eric I Benchimol, Ronald B George, Holly O Witteman

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Mitigating fraud in a fully decentralized clinical trial of a digital health intervention.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. From Engagement to Concerns: Social Media Use Among a Sample of Australian Public Health Professionals.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Participant recruitment for paediatric research using social media: A practical 'how-to' guide for researchers.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Justine DolDalhousie University, Faculty of Health, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8928-7647
Perri R TutelmanIWK Health Centre, Centre for Pediatric Pain Research, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6013-7402
Christine T ChambersIWK Health Centre, Centre for Pediatric Pain Research, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7138-916X
Melanie BarwickThe Hospital for Sick Children, SickKids Research Institute, Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2478-604X
Emily K DrakeDalhousie University, Faculty of Health, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5007-2120
Jennifer A ParkerIWK Health Centre, Centre for Pediatric Pain Research, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9900-4703
Robin ParkerDalhousie University, WK Kellogg Health Sciences Library, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8966-2785
Eric I BenchimolUniversity of Ottawa, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8855-3598
Ronald B GeorgeUniversity of California San Francisco, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1848-036X
Holly O WittemanLaval University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4192-0682

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth researchers are increasingly using social media in a professional capacity, and the applications of social media for health researchers are vast. However, there is currently no published evidence synthesis of the ways in which health researchers use social media professionally, and uncertainty remains as to how best to harness its potential.

objectiveThis scoping review aimed to explore how social media is used by health researchers professionally, as reported in the literature.

methodsThe scoping review methodology guided by Arksey and O'Malley and Levac et al was used. Comprehensive searches based on the concepts of health research and social media were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, and Web of Science databases, with no limitations applied. Articles were screened at the title and abstract level and at full text by two reviewers. One reviewer extracted data that were analyzed descriptively to map the available evidence.

resultsA total of 8359 articles were screened at the title and abstract level, of which 719 were also assessed at full text for eligibility. The 414 articles identified for inclusion were published in 278 different journals. Studies originated from 31 different countries, with the most prevalent being the United States (52.7% [218/414]). The health discipline of the first authors varied, with medicine (33.3% [138/414]) being the most common. A third of the articles covered health generally, with 61 health-specific topics. Papers used a range of social media platforms (mean 1.33 [SD 0.7]). A quarter of the articles screened reported on social media use for participant recruitment (25.1% [104/414]), followed by practical ways to use social media (15.5% [64/414]), and use of social media for content analysis research (13.3% [55/414]). Articles were categorized as celebratory (ie, opportunities for engagement, 72.2% [299/414]), contingent (ie, opportunities and possible limitations, 22.7% [94/414]) and concerned (ie, potentially harmful, 5.1% [21/414]).

conclusionsHealth researchers are increasingly publishing on their use of social media for a range of professional purposes. Although most of the sentiment around the use of social media in health research was celebratory, the uses of social media varied widely. Future research is needed to support health researchers to optimize their social media use.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHumansResearch PersonnelSocial Mediahealthreviewsocial media

Identifiers

PMID31719028
PMCPMC6881779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.