ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2019
Outcome of intramedullary nailing treatment for intertrochanteric femoral fractures.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cephalo-medullary nailing versus dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilisation plate for the treatment of unstable per-trochanteric hip fractures: a meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021Pooled it
- The new trochanteric nail TFN-A has a higher complication rate in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures than the predecessor model PFN-A.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Finite-Element Comparison of a Proximal Femoral Laterally Bionic Intramedullary Nail (PFLBN) Versus PFNA and PFBN for AO/OTA 31-A3.1 Intertrochanteric Fractures.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Association of albumin, ASA class, and time with mortality, Re-admission, and Re-operation after proximal femoral fracture fixation.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2026Article
- Anteromedial cortical support in intertrochanteric fractures: radiographic and clinical validation in a Latin American cohort.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Article
- Subcapital Femoral Neck Fracture Despite Cement-Augmented Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation for an Osteoporotic Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Case Report and Position- and Sliding-Based Decision Guide.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- [Non-Unions of the lower extremities].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Risk factors for implant failure of PFNA-II in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31 A1 and A2).BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Predicting 'sagittally unstable intertrochanteric fractures' that require direct manipulation for reduction: a fracture morphology analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparison of clinical outcomes of trochanteric femoral nail advanced system (TFNA) with and without cement augmentation for geriatric unstable trochanteric fractures: a single-center retrospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Observational
- Intramedullary Nailing in Femoral Diaphyseal Fractures: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Medial lag screw migration in an intramedullary nail combination.BMJ case reports · 2025Article
- Finite Element Analysis of Proximal Femoral Bionic Nail (PFBN), Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation and InterTan for Treatment of Reverse Obliquity Intertrochanteric Fractures.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Subcapital Femoral Fracture with Cephalomedullary Nail Lag Screw Failure after Healed Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Case Report.Orthopedic reviews · 2025Article
- Orthopedic Surgery Resident Exposure to Sliding Hip Screw Fixation for Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Multicenter Study.The Iowa orthopaedic journal · 2025Article
- The "foothill" entry for cephalomedullary nailing in unstable proximal femoral fractures: a technical note with a review of the literature.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Review
- [Nonunions after intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral fractures].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Biomechanical comparison of an intramedullary nail combined with a reconstruction plate combination versus a single intramedullary nail in unstable intertrochanteric fractures with lateral femoral wall fracture: A finite element analysis.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe OTA/AO type 31 A3 intertrochanteric fracture has a transverse or reverse oblique fracture at the lesser trochanteric level, which accentuates the varus compressive stress in the region of the fracture and the implant. Intramedullary fixation using different types of nails is commonly preferred. The purpose of this study is to evaluate intertrochanteric femoral fractures with intramedullary nail treatment in regard to surgical procedure, complications, and clinical outcomes.
methodsFrom one level 1 trauma center, 216 consecutive adult intertrochanteric femoral fractures (OTA/AO type 31 A3) were retrospectively identified with intramedullary nail fixation from 2004 through 2013. Of these, 193 patients (58.5% female) met the inclusion criteria. The average age was 70 years (range 19-96 years).
resultsCephalomedullary nails were utilized in 176 and reconstruction nails in 17 patients. After the index procedure, 86% healed uneventfully. Nonunion development was observed in 6% and 5% had an unscheduled reoperation due to implant or fixation failure. Active smoking was reported in 16.6%. Current smokers had an increased nonunion risk compared to those who do not currently smoke (15.6% vs. 4.3%; p = 0.016). The femoral neck angle averaged 128.0° ± 5°. Fixation failure occurred in 11.1% of patients with a neck-shaft-angle < 125° compared to 2.6% (4/155) of patients with a neck-shaft angle ≥125° (p = 0.021). Patients treated with a reconstruction nail required a second surgical intervention in 23.5%, which was no different compared to 25.0% in the cephalomedullary group (p = 0.893). In the cephalomedullary group, 4.5% developed a nonunion compared to 23.5% in the reconstruction group (p = 0.002). Painful hardware led to hardware removal in 8.8%. All of them were treated with a cephalomedullary device (p = 0.180). During the last office visit, two-thirds of the patients reported no or only mild pain but most patients had reduced hip range of motion.
conclusionIntramedullary nailing is a reliable surgical technique when performed with adequate reduction. Varus reduction with a neck-shaft angle < 125° resulted in an increase in fixation failures. Patient and implant factors affected nonunion formation. Smoking increased nonunion formation. Utilization of a cephalomedullary device reduced the nonunion rate, but had higher rates of painful prominent hardware compared to reconstruction nailing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.