ArticleBMC medicine2019
Live birth rates and perinatal outcomes when all embryos are frozen compared with conventional fresh and frozen embryo transfer: a cohort study of 337,148 in vitro fertilisation cycles.
Article in BMC medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association of Assisted Reproductive Technology With Offspring Growth and Adiposity From Infancy to Early Adulthood.JAMA network open · 2022Pooled it
- Transfer of thawed frozen embryo versus fresh embryo to improve the healthy baby rate in women undergoing IVF: the E-Freeze RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2022Trial
- Elective freezing of embryos versus fresh embryo transfer in IVF: a multicentre randomized controlled trial in the UK (E-Freeze).Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2022Trial
- Neonatal and maternal outcomes following transfer of vitrified embryos compared with slow-frozen and fresh embryos: a retrospective study in singletons.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Frozen versus fresh embryo transfer on perinatal outcomes-do endometrial preparation methods matter?Human reproduction open · 2026Article
- Transfer strategy performance varies with embryo morphokinetic quality in good prognosis IVF/ICSI cycles.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Direct IVF versus prior laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian endometrioma ≥4 cm: cumulative live birth rate and implications for fertility preservation - a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Timelapse-based 3D reconstruction of blastocysts reveals 3D morphologies of human blastocysts.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Good practice recommendations on add-ons in reproductive medicine†.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- In vitro fertilization with frozen embryo transfer increased histamine-mediated contractile sensitivity via PKCβ in human umbilical vein.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2023Article
- Live birth rates in day 5 fresh versus vitrified single blastocyst transfer cycles: A cross-sectional analysis.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2023Article
- Impact of mode of conception on early pregnancy human chorionic gonadotropin rise and birth weight.F&S reports · 2022Article
- When Should We Freeze Embryos? Current Data for Fresh and Frozen Embryo Replacement IVF Cycles.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2021Review
- Separating parental and treatment contributions to perinatal health after fresh and frozen embryo transfer in assisted reproduction: A cohort study with within-sibship analysis.PLoS medicine · 2021Article
- Population implications of cessation of IVF during the COVID-19 pandemic.Reproductive biomedicine online · 2020Article
- The cumulative live birth rate after a freeze-only strategy versus a conventional fresh embryo transfer strategy: a call for more level 1 evidence.BMC medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIt is not known whether segmentation of an in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycle, with freezing of all embryos prior to transfer, increases the chance of a live birth after all embryos are transferred.
methodsIn a prospective study of UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority data, we investigated the impact of segmentation, compared with initial fresh embryo followed by frozen embryo transfers, on live birth rate and perinatal outcomes. We used generalised linear models to assess the effect of segmentation in the whole cohort, with additional analyses within women who had experienced both segmentation and non-segmentation. We compared rates of live birth, low birthweight (LBW < 2.5 kg), preterm birth (< 37 weeks), macrosomia (> 4 kg), small for gestational age (SGA < 10th centile), and large for gestational age (LGA > 90th centile) for a given ovarian stimulation cycle accounting for all embryo transfers.
resultsWe assessed 202,968 women undergoing 337,148 ovarian stimulation cycles and 399,896 embryo transfer procedures. Live birth rates were similar in unadjusted analyses for segmented and non-segmented cycles (rate ratio 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08) but lower in segmented cycles when adjusted for age, cycle number, cause of infertility, and ovarian response (rate ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.78-0.83). Segmented cycles were associated with increased risk of macrosomia (adjusted risk ratio 1.72, 95% CI 1.55-1.92) and LGA (1.51, 1.38-1.66) but lower risk of LBW (0.71, 0.65-0.78) and SGA (0.64, 0.56-0.72). With adjustment for blastocyst/cleavage-stage embryo transfer in those with data on this (329,621 cycles), results were not notably changed. Similar results were observed comparing segmented to non-segmented within 3261 women who had both and when analyses were repeated excluding multiple embryo cycles and multiple pregnancies. When analyses were restricted to women with a single embryo transfer, the transfer of a frozen-thawed embryo in a segmented cycles was no longer associated with a lower risk of LBW (0.97, 0.71-1.33) or SGA (0.84, 0.61-1.15), but the risk of macrosomia (1.74, 1.39-2.20) and LGA (1.49, 1.20-1.86) persisted. When the analyses for perinatal outcomes were further restricted to solely frozen embryo transfers, there was no strong statistical evidence for associations.
conclusionsWidespread application of segmentation and freezing of all embryos to unselected patient populations may be associated with lower cumulative live birth rates and should be restricted to those with a clinical indication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.