Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31718639›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Use of smartphone and perception towards the usefulness and practicality of its medical applications among healthcare workers in Saudi Arabia.

Mostafa A Abolfotouh, Ala'a BaniMustafa, Mahmoud Salam, Mohammed Al-Assiri, Bader Aldebasi, Ibraheem Bushnak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The effect of smartphones and mobile apps in Egyptian Emergency Departments: A cross-sectional study.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Telehealth and Transformation of Nursing Care in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mostafa A AbolfotouhResearch Training & Development Section, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), King Saud bin-Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard- Health Affairs, Riyadh, 11426, Saudi Arabia. mabolfotouh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3787-429X
Ala'a BaniMustafaResearch Office, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), King Saud bin-Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard- Health Affairs, Riyadh, 11426, Saudi Arabia.
Mahmoud SalamResearch Office, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), King Saud bin-Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard- Health Affairs, Riyadh, 11426, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Al-AssiriResearch Office, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), King Saud bin-Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard- Health Affairs, Riyadh, 11426, Saudi Arabia.
Bader AldebasiResearch Training & Development Section, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), King Saud bin-Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard- Health Affairs, Riyadh, 11426, Saudi Arabia.
Ibraheem BushnakResearch Training & Development Section, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), King Saud bin-Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard- Health Affairs, Riyadh, 11426, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Saudi Arabia, healthcare industry is undergoing major expansions to meet the demand of rapidly growing healthcare needs. The aims of this study were; (1) to assess the pattern of smartphone use in healthcare facilities, and (2) to determine perception towards its use among healthcare workers.

methodA cross-sectional survey of 351 healthcare workers (HCWs) at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia was conducted, from October to November 2016, using a previously validated perception domain to measure perception towards usefulness (5 statements) and practicality (5 statements) of smartphones in clinical settings. Pattern of use of smartphones and health-related applications in healthcare facilities was also investigated. Logestic regression models were applied to identify the predictors of smartphone use and installation of health-related applications for use in healthcare facilities. Significance was considered at p-value of < 0.05.

resultsUtilization rate of smartphone was 42.3%, and only 6.1% of all healthcare providers reported always using applications in their practice. Reasons for use were: as a source of drug information (69.8%), for disease diagnosis (56.4%), to access medical websites (42.5%), to review guidelines and protocols related to healthcare (34.1%), for procedure documentation (23.5%), and as a source of patients education materials (22.3%). Perceptions of HCWs towards smartphone use was less than satisfactory (Overall percentage mean score = 60.4 ± 18.7), with only 11.6% reporting positive perception. After adjusting for possible confounders, the total perception mean score was a significant predictor of both smartphone use (β = 0.033, p < 0.001) and medical applications installation (β = 0.033, p < 0.001). Installation of medical applications was also predicted by being a physician (β = 0.008, p = 0.024).

conclusionSmartphone utilization in healthcare facilities by HCWs in Saudi Arabia is low. This could be attributed to their less than satisfactory level of perception towards its use. Smartphone use and installation of medical applications for use in health facilities were predicted by perceived usefulness and practicality of its use. Intervention from higher health authorities is necessary to enforce the importance of smartphone use in clinical practice. Conduction of further studies on the impact of smart phone use on the healthcare quality in Saudi Arabia is recommended.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelSmartphoneAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMobile ApplicationsSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesAttitudeHealthcare facilityHealth-related applicationsPattern of useSmartphone use

Identifiers

PMID31718639
PMCPMC6849260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.