Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31718626›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2019

A review of changes to the attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder age of onset criterion using the checklist for modifying disease definitions.

Sharon Sanders, Rae Thomas, Paul Glasziou, Jenny Doust

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The Impact of ADHD on Children's Language Development.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sharon SandersInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Level 4, Building 5, Gold Coast, Queensland, 4226, Australia. ssanders@bond.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7966-9708
Rae ThomasInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Level 4, Building 5, Gold Coast, Queensland, 4226, Australia.
Paul GlasziouInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Level 4, Building 5, Gold Coast, Queensland, 4226, Australia.
Jenny DoustInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Level 4, Building 5, Gold Coast, Queensland, 4226, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWidening definitions of health conditions have the potential to affect millions of people and should only occur when there is strong evidence of benefit. In the last version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), the DSM-5 Committee changed the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) age of onset criterion in two ways: raising the age of symptom onset and removing the requirement for symptoms to cause impairment. Given concerns about ADHD prevalence and treatment rates, we aimed to evaluate the evidence available to support these changes using a recently developed Checklist for Modifying Disease Definitions.

methodsWe identified and analysed research informing changes to the DSM-IV-TR ADHD age of onset criterion. We compared this evidence to the evidence recommended in the Checklist for Modifying Disease Definitions.

resultsThe changes to the DSM-IV-TR age of onset criterion were based on a literature review (publicly available as a 2 page document with online table of included studies), which we appraised as at high risk of bias. Estimates of the change in ADHD prevalence resulting from change to the age of onset criterion were based on a single study that included only a small number of children with ADHD (n = 68) and only assessed the impact of change to the age component of the criterion. No evidence was used by, or available to the Committee regarding the impact on prevalence of removal of the requirement for impairment, or the effect of the criterion changes on diagnostic precision, the prognosis of, or the potential benefits or harms for individuals diagnosed by the new, but not old criterion.

conclusionsThe changes to the age of onset criterion were based on minimal research evidence that suffered from either high risk of bias or poor applicability. The minimal documentation available makes it difficult to judge the rigor of the process behind the criterion changes. Use of the Checklist for Modifying Disease Definitions would assist future proposed modifications of the DSM ADHD criteria, provide guidance on the studies needed to inform potential changes and would improve the transparency and documentation of the process.

Indexed as

ChecklistAge of OnsetAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersHumansPrevalencePrognosisReview Literature as TopicAttention deficit/hyperactivity disorderDisease definitionsOverdiagnosis

Identifiers

PMID31718626
PMCPMC6849294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.