Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31718569›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

Access to midwifery care for people of low socio-economic status: a qualitative descriptive study.

Elizabeth K Darling, Lindsay Grenier, Lisa Nussey, Beth Murray-Davis, Eileen K Hutton, Meredith Vanstone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth K DarlingMcMaster Midwifery Research Centre, McMaster University, HSC 4H24, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada. darlinek@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2675-3222
Lindsay GrenierMcMaster Midwifery Research Centre, McMaster University, HSC 4H24, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Lisa NusseyMcMaster Midwifery Research Centre, McMaster University, HSC 4H24, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Beth Murray-DavisMcMaster Midwifery Research Centre, McMaster University, HSC 4H24, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Eileen K HuttonMcMaster Midwifery Research Centre, McMaster University, HSC 4H24, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Meredith VanstoneDepartment of Family Medicine, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis McMaster FHS Education Research, Innovation & Theory (MERIT) program, McMaster University, 100 Main St. W, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite public funding of midwifery care, people of low-socioeconomic status are less likely to access midwifery care in Ontario, Canada, but little is known about barriers that they experience in accessing midwifery care. The purpose of this study was to examine the barriers and facilitators to accessing midwifery care experienced by people of low-socioeconomic status.

methodsA qualitative descriptive study design was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 pregnant and post-partum people of low-socioeconomic status in Hamilton, Ontario from January to May 2018. Transcribed interviews were coded using open coding techniques and thematically analyzed.

resultsWe interviewed 13 midwifery care recipients and 17 participants who had never received care from midwives. Four themes arose from the interviews: "I had no idea…", "Babies are born in hospitals", "Physicians as gateways into prenatal care", and "Why change a good thing?". Participants who had not experienced midwifery care had minimal knowledge of midwifery and often had misconceptions about midwives' scope of practice and education. Prevailing beliefs about pregnancy and birth, particularly concerns about safety, drove participants to seek care from a physician. Physicians are the entry point into the health care system for many, yet few participants received information about midwifery care from physicians. Participants who had experienced midwifery care found it to be an appropriate match for the needs of people of low socioeconomic status. Word of mouth was a primary source of information about midwifery and the most common reason for people unfamiliar with midwifery to seek midwifery care.

conclusionsAccess to midwifery care is constrained for people of low-socioeconomic status because lack of awareness about midwifery limits the approachability of these services, and because information about midwifery care is often not provided by physicians when pregnant people first contact the health care system. For people of low-socioeconomic status, inequitable access to midwifery care may be exacerbated by lack of knowledge about midwifery within social networks and a tendency to move passively through the health care system which traditionally favours physician care. Targeted efforts to address this issue are necessary to reduce disparities in access to midwifery care.

Indexed as

MidwiferyAdultFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansOntarioParturitionPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareQualitative ResearchSocial ClassHealthcare accessHealthcare servicesLow-socioeconomic statusMaternity careMidwifery

Identifiers

PMID31718569
PMCPMC6849230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.