Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31718562›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2019

Adjustment of oral diet based on flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in acute stroke patients: a cross-sectional hospital-based registry study.

Tobias Braun, Martin Juenemann, Maxime Viard, Marco Meyer, Iris Reuter, Mario Prosiegel, Manfred Kaps, Christian Tanislav

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Phoniatricians and otorhinolaryngologists approaching oropharyngeal dysphagia: an update on FEES.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tobias BraunDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany. tobias.braun@neuro.med.uni-giessen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1738-2773
Martin JuenemannDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Maxime ViardDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Marco MeyerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Iris ReuterDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Mario ProsiegelLecturer at Faculty of Languages and Literatures, Department I, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Manfred KapsDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Christian TanislavDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg · DEJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnosing dysphagia in acute stroke patients is crucial, as this comorbidity determines morbidity and mortality; we therefore investigated the impact of flexible nasolaryngeal endoscopy (FEES) in acute stroke patients.

methodsThe FEES investigation as performed in acute stroke patients treated at a large university hospital, allocated as a standard procedure for all patients suspected of dysphagia. We correlated our findings with baseline data, disability status, pneumonia, duration of hospitalisation, necessity for mechanical ventilation and treatment on the intensive care unit. The study was designed as a cross-sectional hospital-based registry.

resultsWe investigated 152 patients. The median age was 73; 94 were male. Ischemic stroke was diagnosed in 125 patients (82.2%); 27 (17.8%) suffered intracerebral haemorrhage. Oropharyngeal dysphagia was diagnosed in 72.4% of the patients, and was associated with higher stroke severity on admission (median NIHSS 11 [IQR 6-17] vs. 7 [4-12], p = .013; median mRS 5 [IQR 4-5] vs. 4 [IQR 3-5], p = .012). Short-term mortality was higher among patients diagnosed with dysphagia (7.2% vs. 0%, p = .107). FEES examinations revealed that only 30.9% of the patients had an oral diet appropriate for their swallowing abilities. A change of oral diet was associated with a better outcome at discharge (mRS; p = .006), less need of mechanical ventilation (p = .028), shorter period of hospitalisation (p = .044), and lower rates of pneumonia (p = .007) and mortality (p = .011).

conclusionDue to the inability of clinical assessments to detect silent aspiration, FEES might be better suited to identify stroke patients at risk and may contribute to a better functional outcome and lower rates of pneumonia and mortality. Our findings also point to a low awareness of dysphagia, even in a specialised stroke centre. FEES in acute stroke patients helps to adjust the oral diet for the vast majority of stroke patients (69.1%) based on their swallowing abilities, potentially avoiding severe complications.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDeglutition DisordersDietEndoscopy, Digestive SystemFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesStroke

Identifiers

PMID31718562
PMCPMC6852733
OpenAlexW2984250040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.