ArticleBiology letters2019
Field-realistic antidepressant exposure disrupts group foraging dynamics in mosquitofish.
Article in Biology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impacts of an anxiolytic drug on fish behaviour and habitat use in a natural landscape.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- EthoCRED: a framework to guide reporting and evaluation of the relevance and reliability of behavioural ecotoxicity studies.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025Review
- Continuous improvement towards environmental protection for pharmaceuticals: advancing a strategy for Europe.Environmental sciences Europe · 2025Review
- Pharmaceutical Pollution Alters the Structure of Freshwater Communities and Hinders Their Recovery from a Fish Predator.Environmental science & technology · 2024Article
- Pharmaceutical pollution alters the cost of bacterial infection and its relationship to pathogen load.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Frontiers in quantifying wildlife behavioural responses to chemical pollution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022Review
- Warmer temperatures limit the effects of antidepressant pollution on life-history traits.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Incorporating Animal Social Context in Ecotoxicology: Can a Single Individual Tell the Collective Story?Environmental science & technology · 2021Article
- Fluoxetine results in misleading conclusions on fish behavior.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Antidepressants surveillance in wastewater: Overview extraction and detection.Case studies in chemical and environmental engineering · 2021Article
- Impacts of Oxazepam on Perch (Environmental science & technology · 2021Article
- Protein Signatures to Trace Seafood Contamination and Processing.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Field-realistic antidepressant exposure disrupts group foraging dynamics in mosquitofish.Biology letters · 2019Article
- Sex differences in the predictability of risk-taking behavior.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral EcologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychoactive pollutants, such as antidepressants, are increasingly detected in the environment. Mounting evidence suggests that such pollutants can disrupt the behaviour of non-target species. Despite this, few studies have considered how the response of exposed organisms might be mediated by social context. To redress this, we investigated the impacts of two environmentally realistic concentrations of a pervasive antidepressant pollutant, fluoxetine, on foraging behaviour in fish (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.