Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31718393›Full record

Trial reportJournal of interpersonal violence2021

Do Violence Acceptance and Bystander Actions Explain the Effects of Green Dot on Reducing Violence Perpetration in High Schools?

Heather M Bush, Ann L Coker, Sarah DeGue, Emily R Clear, Candace J Brancato, Bonnie S Fisher

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of interpersonal violence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Heather M BushUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3725-6264
Ann L CokerUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
Sarah DeGueCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Emily R ClearUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8352-5379
Candace J BrancatoUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
Bonnie S FisherUniversity of Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Funding

Green Dot across the Bluegrass: Evaluation of a primary prevention intervention tU01CE001675 · CE · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI COKER, ANN L · 2009 to 2013
$2.0M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCIPC CDC HHS U01 CE001675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study extends prior analyses from a 5-year multisite cluster-randomized controlled trial to examine how the previously reported effects of the Green Dot bystander-based prevention program worked to reduce violence perpetration. Bystander-based interventions are hypothesized to prevent violence by reducing violence acceptance and increasing trained participants' willingness and ability to actively engage others in violence prevention using safe and effective bystander actions to diffuse or avoid potentially violent situations. We tested this hypothesis by examining whether Green Dot worked to reduce violence through two mediators measured over time: reducing violence acceptance and increasing bystander actions. When accounting for changes in these mediators over time, the effect of this intervention on violence perpetration was hypothesized to be attenuated or explained. At baseline (spring 2010) and annually (2011-2014), all students in recruited high schools (13 intervention, 13 control) completed an anonymous survey (response rate = 83.9%). Student responses were aggregated as school-level counts for the analysis. Path analyses estimated direct and indirect effects at specific points in the implementation of the intervention. Longitudinal models were used to determine if changes in violence acceptance and bystander actions could explain or attenuate the effect of the intervention. Time-framed path model analyses indicated that the intervention worked as expected to increase bystander behaviors and reduce violence acceptance; both potential mediators were significantly associated with sexual violence perpetration. In addition, after adjusting intent-to-treat models for the hypothesized mediators, the intervention was no longer associated with violence perpetration. In conclusion, these findings indicate that this bystander intervention worked as hypothesized to reduce sexual violence perpetration by creating theory-based changes in students' violence acceptance and bystander actions.

Indexed as

Sex OffensesViolenceHumansSchoolsStudentsUniversitiesadolescent victimsdating violencedomestic violenceinterventionpreventionsexual assault

Identifiers

PMID31718393
PMCPMC7217713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.