ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Review of Electrochemical DNA Biosensors for Detecting Food Borne Pathogens.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational Framework for High Copy-Number Probe Selection and Cross-Binding Reduction.Analytical science advances · 2025Article
- Nanomaterial Modified Screen Printed Electrode Based Electrochemical Genosensor for Efficient Detection of Neonatal Sepsis.Indian journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- Nucleic Acid Based Testing (NABing): A Game Changer Technology for Public Health.Molecular biotechnology · 2024Review
- Disposable impedance sensors based on novel hybrid MoS2 nanosheets and microparticles to detect Escherichia Coli DNA.PloS one · 2024Article
- Review
- Detection of Listeria monocytogenes in foods with a textile organic electrochemical transistor biosensor.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Bioaffinity Nanoprobes for Foodborne Pathogen Sensing.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Voltammetric Measurement of Antioxidant Activity by Prevention of Cu(II)-Induced Oxidative Damage on DNA Bases Using a Modified Electrode.ACS omega · 2023Article
- Electrochemical Biosensors as a Novel Platform in the Identification of Listeriosis Infection.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Udder Health Monitoring for Prevention of Bovine Mastitis and Improvement of Milk Quality.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Sequence-Specific Electrochemical Genosensor for Rapid Detection ofMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Evaluation of the Interaction of Cinacalcet with Calf Thymus dsDNA: Use of Electrochemical, Spectrofluorimetric, and Molecular Docking Methods.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Harmful Microalgae Detection: Biosensors versus Some Conventional Methods.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Microfluidics for the rapid detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 using antibody-coated microspheres.Bioengineered · 2021Article
- The Requirement of Genetic Diagnostic Technologies for Environmental Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Optical Biosensor Platforms Display Varying Sensitivity for the Direct Detection of Influenza RNA.Biosensors · 2021Article
- A detection method of Escherichia coli O157:H7 based on immunomagnetic separation and aptamers-gold nanoparticle probe quenching Rhodamine B's fluorescence: Escherichia coli O157:H7 detection method based on IMS and Apt-AuNPs probe quenching Rho B' s fluorescence.Food science and biotechnology · 2021Article
- A Review on the Development of Gold and Silver Nanoparticles-Based Biosensor as a Detection Strategy of Emerging and Pathogenic RNA Virus.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Integration of advanced technologies for plant variety and cultivar identification.Journal of biosciences · 2021Review
- Application of Lab-on-Chip for Detection of Microbial Nucleic Acid in Food and Environment.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The vital importance of rapid and accurate detection of food borne pathogens has driven the development of biosensor to prevent food borne illness outbreaks. Electrochemical DNA biosensors offer such merits as rapid response, high sensitivity, low cost, and ease of use. This review covers the following three aspects: food borne pathogens and conventional detection methods, the design and fabrication of electrochemical DNA biosensors and several techniques for improving sensitivity of biosensors. We highlight the main bioreceptors and immobilizing methods on sensing interface, electrochemical techniques, electrochemical indicators, nanotechnology, and nucleic acid-based amplification. Finally, in view of the existing shortcomings of electrochemical DNA biosensors in the field of food borne pathogen detection, we also predict and prospect future research focuses from the following five aspects: specific bioreceptors (improving specificity), nanomaterials (enhancing sensitivity), microfluidic chip technology (realizing automate operation), paper-based biosensors (reducing detection cost), and smartphones or other mobile devices (simplifying signal reading devices).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.