ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Development and Biocompatibility of Collagen-Based Composites Enriched with Nanoparticles of Strontium Containing Mesoporous Glass.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electroactive Nanomaterials in Tissue Engineering: Advances, Mechanisms and Future Perspectives.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Nature-Based Hydrogels Combined with Nanoparticles for Bone Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Advancements in mesoporous bioactive glasses for effective bone cancer therapy: Recent developments and future perspectives.Biomaterials and biosystems · 2025Review
- Engineering mesoporous bioactive glasses for emerging stimuli-responsive drug delivery and theranostic applications.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Bioinspired Collagen/Hyaluronic Acid/Fibrin-Based Hydrogels for Soft Tissue Engineering: Design, Synthesis, and In Vitro Characterization.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Extrusion 3D printing of a multiphase collagen-based material: An optimized strategy to obtain biomimetic scaffolds with high shape fidelity.Journal of applied polymer science · 2023Article
- 3D printing method for bone tissue engineering scaffold.Medicine in novel technology and devices · 2023Article
- 3D bioprinting of ultrashort self-assembling peptides to engineer scaffolds with different matrix stiffness for chondrogenesis.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- Frontiers of Hydroxyapatite Composites in Bionic Bone Tissue Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses Incorporated into an Injectable Thermosensitive Hydrogel for Sustained Co-Release of SrPharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Bone Tissue Engineering in the Treatment of Bone Defects.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Strontium Functionalization of Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering Purposes: A Biological Point of View.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- 3D Printed Scaffold Based on Type I Collagen/PLGA_TGF-β1 Nanoparticles Mimicking the Growth Factor Footprint of Human Bone Tissue.Polymers · 2022Article
- Article
- Polyelectrolyte-Coated Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses via Layer-by-Layer Deposition for Sustained Co-Delivery of Therapeutic Ions and Drugs.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- 3D Printing in Alginic Acid Bath of In-Situ Crosslinked Collagen Composite Scaffolds.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Current Biomaterial-Based Bone Tissue Engineering and Translational Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- PEG-Coated Large Mesoporous Silicas as Smart Platform for Protein Delivery and Their Use in a Collagen-Based Formulation for 3D Printing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses Cytocompatibility Assessment: A Review of In Vitro Studies.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Collagen Hybrid Formulations for the 3D Printing of Nanostructured Bone Scaffolds: An Optimized Genipin-Crosslinking Strategy.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In the last years bone tissue engineering has been increasingly indicated as a valid solution to meet the challenging requirements for a healthy bone regeneration in case of bone loss or fracture. In such a context, bioactive glasses have already proved their great potential in promoting the regeneration of new bone tissue due to their high bioactivity. In addition, their composition and structure enable us to incorporate and subsequently release therapeutic ions such as strontium, enhancing the osteogenic properties of the material. The incorporation of these inorganic systems in polymeric matrices enables the formulation of composite systems suitable for the design of bone scaffolds or delivery platforms. Among the natural polymers, type I collagen represents the main organic phase of bone and thus is a good candidate to develop biomimetic bioactive systems for bone tissue regeneration. However, alongside the specific composition and structure, the key factor in the design of new biosystems is creating a suitable interaction with cells and the host tissue. In this scenario, the presented study aimed at combining nano-sized mesoporous bioactive glasses produced by means of a sol-gel route with type I collagen in order to develop a bioactive hybrid formulation suitable for bone tissue engineering applications. The designed system has been fully characterized in terms of physico-chemical and morphological analyses and the ability to release Sr
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.