Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31717956›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Urban Green Space: Creating a Triple Win for Environmental Sustainability, Health, and Health Equity through Behavior Change.

Hanneke Kruize, Nina van der Vliet, Brigit Staatsen, Ruth Bell, Aline Chiabai, Gabriel Muiños, Sahran Higgins, Sonia Quiroga, Pablo Martinez-Juarez, Monica Aberg Yngwe and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Hanneke KruizeCentre for Sustainability, Environment and Health, RIVM, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Nina van der VlietCentre for Sustainability, Environment and Health, RIVM, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Brigit StaatsenCentre for Sustainability, Environment and Health, RIVM, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Ruth BellInstitute of Health Equity, UCL, London WC1E 7HB, UK.
Aline ChiabaiBasque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), 48940 Leioa, Spain.
Gabriel MuiñosInstituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), CIS-IUL, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal.
Sahran HigginsEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Truro TR1 3HD, UK.
Sonia QuirogaDepartment of Economics, Universidad de Alcalá, Plaza de la Victoria, 2, E-28802 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4269-5053
Pablo Martinez-JuarezDepartment of Economics, Universidad de Alcalá, Plaza de la Victoria, 2, E-28802 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
Monica Aberg YngweDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Stockholm University, Institutionen för folkhälsovetenskap, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8642-2252
Fotis TsichlasInstitute of Preventive Medicine Environmental & Occupational Health, Prolepsis, 7, Fragoklisias street, 151 25 Marousi, Greece.
Pania KarnakiInstitute of Preventive Medicine Environmental & Occupational Health, Prolepsis, 7, Fragoklisias street, 151 25 Marousi, Greece.
Maria Luísa LimaInstituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), CIS-IUL, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal.
Silvestre García de JalónBasque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), 48940 Leioa, Spain.
Matluba KhanInstitute of Health Equity, UCL, London WC1E 7HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5546-1870
George MorrisEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Truro TR1 3HD, UK.
Ingrid StegemanEuroHealthNet, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urbanization, costs of green space maintenance, and diminishing connection between people and nature all exert pressures on urban green space. This is regrettable as green space has the potential to create wins for environmental sustainability, health, and health equity. This paper explores this potential triple win and investigates how to increase the use of urban green space through behavior change. A narrative literature review was conducted and was supplemented with literature suggested by experts. Results show that creating well-designed green spaces and stimulating people to use them can indeed deliver this triple win. Providing accessible, attractive, well-maintained green space with room for socialization, and where people feel safe, may increase the opportunity and motivation of people to use it more often. Informing and educating people and organizing activities may increase capability (and motivation) to use green space. Since the use of green space depends on life stage, lifestyle factors and individual values, it is important to involve potential users in its design. We recommend a specific focus on those groups who may benefit most from the use of green space. More evaluation is needed to inform effective green space interventions and to assess related economic, social, and environmental benefits.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyConservation of Natural ResourcesHealth EquityUrbanizationHumansUrban Healthbehavior changeenvironmental sustainabilitygreen spacehealthhealth equity

Identifiers

PMID31717956
PMCPMC6888177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.