Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31717932›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2019

AC Electrothermal Effect in Microfluidics: A Review.

Alinaghi Salari, Maryam Navi, Thomas Lijnse, Colin Dalton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alinaghi SalariBiomedical Engineering Graduate Program, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.
Maryam NaviBiomedical Engineering Graduate Program, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.
Thomas LijnseBiomedical Engineering Graduate Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4049-5215
Colin DaltonBiomedical Engineering Graduate Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7855-2727

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The electrothermal effect has been investigated extensively in microfluidics since the 1990s and has been suggested as a promising technique for fluid manipulations in lab-on-a-chip devices. The purpose of this article is to provide a timely overview of the previous works conducted in the AC electrothermal field to provide a comprehensive reference for researchers new to this field. First, electrokinetic phenomena are briefly introduced to show where the electrothermal effect stands, comparatively, versus other mechanisms. Then, recent advances in the electrothermal field are reviewed from different aspects and categorized to provide a better insight into the current state of the literature. Results and achievements of different studies are compared, and recommendations are made to help researchers weigh their options and decide on proper configuration and parameters.

Indexed as

electrothermalmicroelectrodemicrofluidicsmicromixingmicropump

Identifiers

PMID31717932
PMCPMC6915365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.