ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2019
The Effect of the Intelligent Sepsis Management System on Outcomes among Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock Diagnosed According to the Sepsis-3 Definition in the Emergency Department.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of manual sepsis screening in hospitalized adult patients: A systematic review.Journal of hospital medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Sepsis Alert Systems, Mortality, and Adherence in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical Outcomes for Emergency Department Presentations of Sepsis Managed on a Clinical Pathway: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2026.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a screening tool for sepsis without laboratory results in the emergency department: a machine learning study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Impact of Point-of-Care Lactate Testing for Sepsis on Bundle Adherence and Clinical Outcomes in the Emergency Department: A Pre-Post Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The mortality of patients with sepsis increases in the first month of a new academic year.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of automated alerting system compared to usual care for the management of sepsis.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Article
- The Ramathibodi early warning score as a sepsis screening tool does not reduce the timing of antibiotic administration.International journal of emergency medicine · 2022Article
- Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems for the Early Detection of Sepsis Among Adult Inpatients: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of presepsin and procalcitonin in non-infectious organ failure, sepsis, and septic shock: a prospective observational study according to the Sepsis-3 definitions.BMC infectious diseases · 2022Observational
- Molecular mechanisms in septic shock (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Review
- Vasoactive-Inotropic Score as an Early Predictor of Mortality in Adult Patients with Sepsis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We developed a novel computer program, the Intelligent Sepsis Management System, based on Sepsis-3 definitions and 2016 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines and performed a quasi-experimental pre-post study to assess its effect on compliance with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines and outcomes in patients with sepsis and septic shock. During the pre-period, patients were managed with usual care. During the post-period, patients were managed using the Intelligent Sepsis Management System upon arrival at the emergency department. A total of 631 patients were enrolled (pre-period, 316; post-period, 315). The overall compliance with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines' bundle improved (pre-period 10.8% vs. post-period 54.6%;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.