Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31717800›Full record

ArticleViruses2019

Evolution of a Landscape Phage Library in a Mouse Xenograft Model of Human Breast Cancer.

James W Gillespie, Liping Yang, Laura Maria De Plano, Murray A Stackhouse, Valery A Petrenko

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Role of Phage Capsid in the Resistance to UV-C Radiations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Phage Display to Augment Biomaterial Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Evolving a Peptide: Library Platforms and Diversification Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

James W GillespieDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3779-1072
Liping YangDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Laura Maria De PlanoDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Murray A StackhouseDrug Development, Southern Research, Birmingham, AL 35205, USA.
Valery A PetrenkoDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5602-8780
Auburn University · USHenan Normal University · CNSouthern Research Institute · USUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptide-displayed phage libraries are billion-clone collections of diverse chimeric bacteriophage particles, decorated by genetically fused peptides built from a random combination of natural amino acids. Studying the molecular evolution of peptide-displayed libraries in mammalian model systems, using in vivo phage display techniques, can provide invaluable knowledge about the underlying physiology of the vasculature system, allow recognition of organ- and tissue-specific networks of protein-protein interactions, and provide ligands for targeted diagnostics and therapeutics. Recently, we discovered that landscape phage libraries, a specific type of multivalent peptide phage display library, expose on their surface comprehensive collections of elementary binding units (EBUs), which can form short linear motifs (SLiMs) that interact with functional domains of physiologically relevant proteins. Because of their unique structural and functional features, landscape phages can use an alternative mechanism of directed molecular evolution, i.e., combinatorial avidity selection. These discoveries fueled our interest in revisiting the in vivo evolution of phage displayed libraries using another format of display, i.e., landscape phages. In this study, we monitored the evolution of a landscape phage library in a mouse model with and without an implanted human breast cancer tumor xenograft. As expected, the multivalent architecture of landscape phage displayed proteins provided strong tissue selectivity and resulted in a huge diversity of tissue penetrating, chimeric phage particles. We identified several types of EBU interactions that evolved during the course of tissue distribution, which included interactions of EBUs with all tissue types, those EBUs that interacted selectively with specific organs or tissues with shared gene expression profiles or functionalities, and other EBUs that interacted in a tissue-selective manner. We demonstrated that landscape phage libraries are a rich collection of unique nanobioparticles that can be used to identify functional organ and tissue-binding elements after the evolution of a phage display library in vivo.

Indexed as

Gene LibraryAnimalsBacteriophagesBreast NeoplasmsCell Surface Display TechniquesEvolution, MolecularFemaleHeterograftsHumansMiceMice, Nudebreast cancerdirected molecular evolutionelementary binding units (EBUs)in vivolandscape phagephage displayshort linear motifs (SLiMs)tissue-selective motifs

Identifiers

PMID31717800
PMCPMC6893515
OpenAlexW2982091454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.