ArticleMicroorganisms2019
Article in Microorganisms, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of the Intestinal Microbiota in Wild and Aquaculture Populations ofMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Epidemiological, pathological and microbiological investigation of neonatal lamb mortality in the region of Constantine, Algeria.Veterinary record open · 2025Article
- Current Trends in Approaches to Prevent and Control Antimicrobial Resistance in Aquatic Veterinary Medicine.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Dietary ProbioticAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Long-Term Application of a Synbiotic Chitosan andMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Isolation and characterization of autochthonous probiotics from skin mucus and their in vivo validation with dietary probiotic bacteria on growth performance and immunity of Labeo calbasu (Hamilton, 1822).Fish physiology and biochemistry · 2023Article
- In Silico and In Vitro Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Potential ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The Alteration of Intestinal Microbiota Profile and Immune Response inLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Probiotic Effects of a Novel Strain,Microorganisms · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The bacterial strain KU011TH was isolated from the skin mucus of healthy bighead catfish. The strain is a Gram-negative coccobacillus that is nonmotile, aerobic, catalase positive, oxidase negative, and nonhemolytic. Sequence analyses of the housekeeping genes
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.