Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31717571›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2019

Associations between Food Group Intake, Cognition, and Academic Achievement in Elementary Schoolchildren.

Rachel Bleiweiss-Sande, Kenneth Chui, Catherine Wright, Sarah Amin, Stephanie Anzman-Frasca, Jennifer M Sacheck

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Consumption of Sweets and Academic Performance among Mongolian Children.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachel Bleiweiss-SandeJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior & Society, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0693-9102
Kenneth ChuiTufts University Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Department of Public Health & Community Medicine, 136 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Catherine WrightFriedman School of Nutrition Science & Policy at Tufts University, 75 Kneeland Street, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Sarah AminUniversity of Rhode Island, Fogarty Hall, 41 Lower College Road, Kingston, RI 02881, USA.
Stephanie Anzman-FrascaUniversity at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Division of Behavioral Medicine, G56 Farber Hall, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Jennifer M SacheckMilken Institute of Public Health, The George Washington University, 950 New Hampshire Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7690-663X

Funding

Understanding the Impact of School-Based Physical Activity ProgramsR01HD080180 · NICHD · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SACHECK, JENNIFER · 2014 to 2017
$1.9M
Boston Foundation Not ApplicableEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R01HD080180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutrition plays an important role in proper physical and cognitive functioning. However, there is limited evidence on the relationship between overall diet, cognition, and academic success in children, particularly among low-income and diverse groups. The objective of this study was to examine the relationships between healthful versus less healthful food group intake, cognitive performance, and academic achievement in a diverse sample of schoolchildren. 868 urban schoolchildren (age 8 to 10 years) participated in the study. Intake of healthful (fruits, vegetables, unsweetened beverages) and less healthful (sweet and salty snacks, sugar-sweetened beverages) food groups was determined via a food frequency questionnaire. Digit Span and Stroop test scores were used to assess cognitive performance. Academic achievement was assessed via standardized test scores. Multiple Poisson and multiple linear regression were used to test the associations between diet and cognitive scores. Multiple ordered logistic regression was used to assess the associations between diet and academic achievement. Potential confounders (age, sex, body mass index (BMI) z-score, race/ethnicity, English language learner status, individualized education plan enrollment, physical activity, and parent education level) were tested for inclusion in all models. The sample included 868 children (56.7% girls; 33.2% non-Hispanic white, 26.2% Hispanic, 17.1% multiracial/other, 8.3% non-Hispanic black; 40.5% overweight/obese). The most frequently consumed foods were fruits and sweet snacks (1.9 and 1.6 servings per day, respectively). There were no statistically significant associations between diet and cognitive test scores. Greater intake of less healthful food groups (sweet snacks, salty snacks, and sweetened beverages) was associated with lower math (OR = 0.91, CI [0.84, 0.98],

Indexed as

Academic SuccessChildCognitionDietDiet SurveysExerciseFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMalePovertySnacksacademic achievementchildrencognitiondietfood groupslow-incomenutrition

Identifiers

PMID31717571
PMCPMC6893423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.