Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31717503›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Physiological and Transcriptional Responses of Industrial Rapeseed (

Ji Wang, Jiao Jiao, Mengjia Zhou, Zeyang Jin, Yongjian Yu, Mingxiang Liang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Systematic Analysis of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ji WangDepartment of Ecology, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Jiao JiaoDepartment of Ecology, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Mengjia ZhouDepartment of Ecology, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Zeyang JinDepartment of Ecology, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Yongjian YuDepartment of Ecology, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Mingxiang LiangDepartment of Ecology, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Marine Biology Institute of Shandong Province · CNNanjing Agricultural University · CN

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities KYZ201711National Natural Science Foundation of China 31571702Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions PAPD program, 809001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abiotic stress greatly inhibits crop growth and reduces yields. However, little is known about the transcriptomic changes that occur in the industrial oilseed crop, rapeseed (

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantStress, PhysiologicalBrassica napusDroughtsPlant ProteinsSalt StressSeedlingsTranscriptional ActivationTranscriptomePlant ProteinsBrassica napusdroughtprolinesalinitytranscription factorstranscriptomic analysis

Identifiers

PMID31717503
PMCPMC6888191
OpenAlexW2985814270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.