Observational studyPediatric research2020
Changepoint analysis of gestational age and birth weight: proposing a refinement of Diagnosis Related Groups.
Observational study in Pediatric research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An adaptive and interpretable case grouping framework for healthcare payment systems.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- A tree-structured multiobjective optimization framework for constructing diagnosis-related groups.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- DRGKB: a knowledgebase of worldwide diagnosis-related groups' practices for comparison, evaluation and knowledge-guided application.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- Prediction of Obstetric Patient Flow and Horizontal Allocation of Medical Resources Based on Time Series Analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough the complexity and length of treatment is connected to the newborn's maturity and birth weight, most case-mix grouping schemes classify newborns by birth weight alone. The objective of this study was to determine whether the definition of thresholds based on a changepoint analysis of variability of birth weight and gestational age contributes to a more homogenous classification.
methodsThis retrospective observational study was conducted at a Tertiary Care Center with Level III Neonatal Intensive Care and included neonate cases from 2016 through 2018. The institutional database of routinely collected health data was used. The design of this cohort study was explorative. The cases were categorized according to WHO gestational age classes and SwissDRG birth weight classes. A changepoint analysis was conducted. Cut-off values were determined.
resultsWhen grouping the cases according to the calculated changepoints, the variability within the groups with regard to case related costs could be reduced. A refined grouping was achieved especially with cases of >2500 g birth weight. An adjusted Grouping Grid for practical purposes was developed.
conclusionsA novel method of classification of newborn cases by changepoint analysis was developed, providing the possibility to assign costs or outcome indicators to grouping mechanisms by gestational age and birth weight combined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31715621What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.