Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31714471›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic trauma2020

The Pararectus Approach in Acetabular Surgery: Radiological and Clinical Outcome.

Lisa Wenzel, Christian von Rüden, Andreas Thannheimer, Johannes Becker, Andreas Brand, Peter Augat, Mario Perl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A systemic review and meta-analysis of pararectus versus ilioinguinal approach for the management of acetabular fractures.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. The pararectus approach in acetabular fracture fixation: evidence of reproducibility and learnability.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Anterior extrapelvic approaches to the acetabulum.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A new modified pararectus approach and visualization: an anatomical study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Early biomechanical outcome in patients with acetabular fractures treated using the pararectus approach: a gait and stair climb analysis study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lisa WenzelDepartment of Trauma Surgery, BG Trauma Center Murnau, Murnau, Germany.
Christian von RüdenDepartment of Trauma Surgery, BG Trauma Center Murnau, Murnau, Germany.
Andreas ThannheimerDepartment of Trauma Surgery, BG Trauma Center Murnau, Murnau, Germany.
Johannes BeckerDepartment of Trauma Surgery, BG Trauma Center Murnau, Murnau, Germany.
Andreas BrandInstitute for Biomechanics, BG Trauma Center Murnau, Murnau, Germany.
Peter AugatInstitute for Biomechanics, BG Trauma Center Murnau, Murnau, Germany.
Mario PerlDepartment of Trauma Surgery, BG Trauma Center Murnau, Murnau, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate radiological fracture reduction and clinical results using the pararectus approach in complex acetabular fractures involving the anterior column.

designRetrospective database analysis of prospectively collected data.

settingLevel 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/

participants61 patients (48 male and 13 female) with a median age of 55 (range 17-91) years were included. According to the chosen surgical approach, they were divided into 2 groups. The P-group included 43 patients, among them 32 male and 11 female patients with a median age of 55 (range 17-90) years. Eighteen patients [16 male, 2 female; median age: 53 (range 23-91) years] were treated through the ilioinguinal approach (I-group).

interventionAnterior surgical procedures through the pararectus or the ilioinguinal approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURED: Reduction results were rated according to the modified Matta criteria using a measurement protocol of hip joint gaps and steps in computed tomography scans. Operation time, complications, and clinical outcomes median one year postoperatively were compared.

resultsIn the pararectus group reduction was anatomical in 21 out of 40 analyzed patients (52.5%), imperfect in 11 patients (27.5%), and poor in 8 patients (20%). The mean joint step reduction was 3.7 mm, and the mean joint gap reduction was 12.1 mm. In the ilioinguinal group reduction was anatomical in 9 out of 18 patients (50%), imperfect in 4 patients (22%), and poor in 5 patients (28%). The mean joint step reduction was 1 mm, and the mean joint gap reduction was 7 mm. Operation time was significantly shorter in the P-group (mean: 49 minutes; P < 0.001).

conclusionsThis study indicates that acetabular fracture reduction using the pararectus approach is at least comparable with the ilioinguinal approach independent of patients' age. A relevant advantage of the pararectus approach was seen in a significantly shorter operation time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneHip FracturesAcetabulumAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31714471
PMCPMC6970543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.