Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31714209›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

DNA damage checkpoint activation impairs chromatin homeostasis and promotes mitotic catastrophe during aging.

Matthew M Crane, Adam E Russell, Brent J Schafer, Ben W Blue, Riley Whalen, Jared Almazan, Mung Gi Hong, Bao Nguyen, Joslyn E Goings, Kenneth L Chen and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Chromatin: the old and young of it.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Molecular and cellular biology · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew M CraneDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6234-0954
Adam E RussellDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
Brent J SchaferDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
Ben W BlueDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
Riley WhalenDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
Jared AlmazanDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
Mung Gi HongDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
Bao NguyenDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
Joslyn E GoingsDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
Kenneth L ChenDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
Ryan KellyDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
Matt KaeberleinDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1311-3421
University of Washington · US

Funding

SPECIFICITY OF OXYGEN DNA DAMAGE AND MUTAGENESISP01AG001751 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PRUSKY, GLEN THOMAS · 1985 to 2021
$29.6M
University of Washington Nathan Shock Center of Excellence in the Basic Biology of AgingP30AG013280 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Maitreya J Dunham · 1995 to 2026
$27.1M
GENETIC APPROACHES TO AGING RESEARCHT32AG000057 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RABINOVITCH, PETER S · 1985 to 2019
$14.2M
Emergent properties of signaling network degradation that mediate homeostatic failure during agingR01AG056359 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KAEBERLEIN, MATT, VILLEN, JUDIT · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG001751NIA NIH HHS P30 AG013280NIA NIH HHS P30AG013280NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056359NIA NIH HHS R01AG056359NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000057NIA NIH HHS T32AG000057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome instability is a hallmark of aging and contributes to age-related disorders such as cancer and Alzheimer's disease. The accumulation of DNA damage during aging has been linked to altered cell cycle dynamics and the failure of cell cycle checkpoints. Here, we use single cell imaging to study the consequences of increased genomic instability during aging in budding yeast and identify striking age-associated genome missegregation events. This breakdown in mitotic fidelity results from the age-related activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and the resulting degradation of histone proteins. Disrupting the ability of cells to degrade histones in response to DNA damage increases replicative lifespan and reduces genomic missegregations. We present several lines of evidence supporting a model of antagonistic pleiotropy in the DNA damage response where histone degradation, and limited histone transcription are beneficial to respond rapidly to damage but reduce lifespan and genomic stability in the long term.

Indexed as

DNA DamageHomeostasisMitosisAgingCell Cycle CheckpointsChromatinHumansChromatinagingcell biologyextrachromosomal rDNA circleshistonesmicrofluidicsreplicative lifespanS. cerevisiaesenescence

Identifiers

PMID31714209
PMCPMC6850777
OpenAlexW2983227768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.