Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31714144›Full record

ArticleJournal of athletic training2019

Access to Athletic Trainer Services in California Secondary Schools.

Eric G Post, Karen G Roos, Stephen Rivas, Tricia M Kasamatsu, Jason Bennett

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of athletic training, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Disparities in Youth Sports and Barriers to Participation.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric G PostSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, CA.
Karen G RoosDepartment of Kinesiology, California State University, Long Beach.
Stephen RivasNewport Orthopedic Institute, Newport Beach, CA.
Tricia M KasamatsuDepartment of Kinesiology, California State University, Fullerton.
Jason BennettDepartment of Kinesiology, California State University, Fullerton.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextCalifornia is currently the only state that does not regulate who can and cannot call themselves athletic trainers (ATs). Therefore, previous national or state-specific investigations may not have provided an accurate representation of AT availability at the secondary school level in California. Similarly, it is unknown whether the factors that influence AT availability in California, such as socioeconomic status, are similar to or different from those identified in previous studies.

objectiveTo describe the availability of ATs certified by the Board of Certification in California secondary schools and to examine potential factors influencing access to AT services in California secondary schools.

designCross-sectional study.

settingOnline survey. PATIENTS OR OTHER

participantsRepresentatives of 1270 California high schools. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Officials from member schools completed the 2017-2018 California Interscholastic Federation Participation Census. Respondents provided information regarding school type, student and student-athlete enrollment, whether the school had ATs on staff, and whether the ATs were certified by the Board of Certification. The socioeconomic status of public and charter schools was determined using the percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch.

resultsMore than half (54.6%) of schools reported that they either did not employ ATs (47.6%) or employed unqualified health personnel (UHP) in the role of AT (7.0%). Nearly 30% of student-athletes in California participated in athletics at a school that did not employ ATs (n = 191 626, 28.9%) and 8% of student-athletes participated at a school that employed UHP in the role of AT (n = 54 361, 8.2%). Schools that reported employing ATs had a lower proportion of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch than schools that did not employ ATs and schools that employed UHP (both

conclusionsWith ongoing legislative efforts to obtain regulation of ATs in California, secondary school administrators are encouraged to hire ATs with the proper certification to enhance the patient care provided to student-athletes and improve health outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultAthletesCaliforniaCertificationCross-Sectional StudiesEmploymentFemaleHealth PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleSchoolsSportsSports MedicineStudentsSurveys and Questionnairesappropriate medical coveragehealth care accesssocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID31714144
PMCPMC6922569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.