ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2019
Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy and Foraminoplasty for Treating Central Lumbar Stenosis.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Evaluation of Surgery for Single-Segment Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.Orthopaedic surgery · 2022Pooled it
- A clinical nomogram for predicting the residual low back pain after percutaneous endoscopic surgery for lumbar disc herniation.International orthopaedics · 2023Trial
- Comparison Between Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy and Fenestration in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020Trial
- Impact of arthroscopic experience on the learning curve in interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a single-center prospective cohort study of 240 patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Observational
- Efficacy of visualized reamer foraminoplasty in transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a retrospective controlled study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Foraminoplasty Performed with a Trephine and a New Tool in Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
- Global Trends and Hotspots of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2024Article
- Reoperations After Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Decompression for Treating Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Incidence and Predictors.Global spine journal · 2023Article
- Percutaneous Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Disease after Lumbar Fusion in Elderly Patients.Orthopaedic surgery · 2023Article
- Complications and Management of Endoscopic Spinal Surgery.Neurospine · 2023Article
- Efficacy of Repeat Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression for Reoperation of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Study.Journal of pain research · 2023Article
- Global Trends and Hotspots in Endoscopic Discectomy: A Study Based on Bibliometric Analysis.Neurospine · 2022Article
- Comparison of the efficacy of fully endoscopic spine surgery using transforaminal and interlaminar approaches in the treatment of prolapsed lumbar 4/5 disc herniation.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Article
- Comparison of the safety and efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and uniportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion: a 1-year follow-up.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Article
- A Comparison Between Retaining and Resecting the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy for Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Orthopaedic surgery · 2022Article
- Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Full-Endoscopic Visualized Foraminoplasty and Discectomy Versus Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation.Orthopaedic surgery · 2022Article
- Identification of preoperative radiological risk factors for reoperation following percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression to treat degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Article
- Decompression Using Minimally Invasive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Review.Pain and therapy · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveLumbar spinal stenosis is a medical condition characterized by the narrowing of the spinal canal as a consequence of bone and soft tissue degeneration, including disc herniation, facet and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy, and osteophyte formation. The percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) technique is one of the emerging surgical alternatives for treating central lumbar stenosis. The present study aims to describe the present techniques of PTED and foraminoplasty for central lumbar stenosis, and discuss the feasibility and advantages of this technique.
methodsA total of 55 patients with an average age of 50 years were recruited in this study. They were operated on between August 2017 and June 2018 by a single surgeon for symptomatic lumbar stenosis using the PTED and foraminoplasty technique, along with a detailed description of the present technique. The retrospective analysis of 55 patients operated between August 2017 and June 2018 by a single surgeon for symptomatic lumbar stenosis using the PTED and foraminoplasty techniques, and the detailed description of the present technique were the focus of the present study. For all patients, the PTED and foraminoplasty procedure was performed under local anesthesia in the lateral position on a radiolucent table using C-arm fluoroscopy. The retrospective analysis evaluated the outcomes of symptoms through follow-up interviews at six weeks, six months, and one year after surgery. The analyzed parameters included surgery time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Japan Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The modified MacNab criteria were adopted.
resultsThe average duration of symptoms was 15.6 weeks. The mean operative time was 161 minutes. The mean volume of intraoperative blood loss was 21 mL. The mean follow-up period was 14.6 months. The average preoperative VAS score for leg pain and low back pain was 6.8 and 5.5, respectively. The preoperative ODI and JOA score was 49.2 and 14.6, respectively. At the final follow-up, all 55 patients had an average VAS score of 1.1 for leg pain and 0.5 for low back pain. At the same time, the average ODI and JOA score was seven and 24.5, respectively. The statistical analysis showed that the VAS score, ODI value, and JOA score were significantly lower in all time-points at post-operation, when compared to those at pre-operation. For the modified MacNab criteria, the final outcome results were excellent in 39 patients (70.9%), good in nine patients (16.4%), fair in four patients (7.3%), and poor in two patients (3.6%), and the overall success rate was 89.1%. Two patients underwent a second operation during the follow-up period, and their symptoms were released after the reoperation.
conclusionPTED and foraminoplasty technique showed promising outcomes in the treatment of central lumbar stenosis in a 1-year follow-up period. It suggested that PTED and foraminoplasty might be applied as a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with lumbar stenosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.