Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31713952›Full record

Trial reportHuman brain mapping2020

Working memory training and brain structure and function in extremely preterm or extremely low birth weight children.

Claire E Kelly, Deanne K Thompson, Jian Chen, Elisha K Josev, Leona Pascoe, Megan M Spencer-Smith, Chris Adamson, Chiara Nosarti, Susan Gathercole, Gehan Roberts and 4 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Good vibrations: Sternal vibration enhances white matter density and interoceptive awareness.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Claire E KellyVictorian Infant Brain Studies (VIBeS), Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6564-0872
Deanne K ThompsonVictorian Infant Brain Studies (VIBeS), Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8017-5756
Jian ChenDevelopmental Imaging, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Elisha K JosevVictorian Infant Brain Studies (VIBeS), Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4686-6331
Leona PascoeVictorian Infant Brain Studies (VIBeS), Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Megan M Spencer-SmithVictorian Infant Brain Studies (VIBeS), Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Chris AdamsonDevelopmental Imaging, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8084-8305
Chiara NosartiCentre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Susan GathercoleMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Gehan RobertsDepartment of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Katherine J LeeVictorian Infant Brain Studies (VIBeS), Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lex W DoyleVictorian Infant Brain Studies (VIBeS), Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Marc L SealDevelopmental Imaging, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Peter J AndersonVictorian Infant Brain Studies (VIBeS), Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study in children born extremely preterm (EP; <28 weeks' gestational age) or extremely low birth weight (ELBW; <1,000 g) investigated whether adaptive working memory training using Cogmed® is associated with structural and/or functional brain changes compared with a placebo program. Ninety-one EP/ELBW children were recruited at a mean (standard deviation) age of 7.8 (0.4) years. Children were randomly allocated to Cogmed or placebo (45-min sessions, 5 days a week over 5-7 weeks). A subset had usable magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data pretraining and 2 weeks posttraining (structural, n = 48; diffusion, n = 43; task-based functional, n = 18). Statistical analyses examined whether cortical morphometry, white matter microstructure and blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal during an n-back working memory task changed from pretraining to posttraining in the Cogmed and placebo groups separately. Interaction analyses between time point and group were then performed. There was a significant increase in neurite density in several white matter regions from pretraining to posttraining in both the Cogmed and placebo groups. BOLD signal in the posterior cingulate and precuneus cortices during the n-back task increased from pretraining to posttraining in the Cogmed but not placebo group. Evidence for group-by-time interactions for the MRI measures was weak, suggesting that brain changes generally did not differ between Cogmed and placebo groups. Overall, while some structural and functional MRI changes between the pretraining and posttraining period in EP/ELBW children were observed, there was little evidence of training-induced neuroplasticity, with changes generally identified in both groups. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, anzctr.org.au; ACTRN12612000124831.

Indexed as

Cognitive RemediationPractice, PsychologicalBrain MappingChildFemaleGyrus CinguliHumansInfant, Extremely Low Birth WeightInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory, Short-TermNeuronal PlasticityOutcome Assessment, Health CareParietal LobeCogmeddiffusion imagingfunctional imagingmagnetic resonance imagingmicrostructurepreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID31713952
PMCPMC6977425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.