Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31713918›Full record

SynthesisThe International journal of pharmacy practice2020

Systematic review and narrative synthesis of pharmacist provided medicines optimisation services in care homes for older people to inform the development of a generic training or accreditation process.

David John Wright, Vivienne Maskrey, Annie Blyth, Nigel Norris, David P Alldred, Christine M Bond, James Desborough, Carmel M Hughes, Richard Charles Holland

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The International journal of pharmacy practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David John WrightSchool of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3690-9593
Vivienne MaskreySchool of Medicine, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Annie BlythSchool of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Nigel NorrisSchool of Education & Lifelong Learning, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
David P AlldredSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2525-4854
Christine M BondCentre of Academic and Primary Care, The Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0429-5208
James DesboroughSchool of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Carmel M HughesSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4656-6021
Richard Charles HollandLeicester Medical School, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4663-6923

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0613-20007Health ResearchMedical Research Council G0902184National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research (PGfAR) Programme RP-PG-0613-20007Programme Grants for Applied Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a training programme to enable pharmacists with prescribing rights to assume responsibility for the provision of pharmaceutical care within care homes, a systematic review and narrative synthesis was undertaken to identify reported approaches to training pharmacists and use this literature to identify potential knowledge requirements.

methodsA PROSPERO-registered systematic review was performed using key search terms for care homes, pharmacist, education, training and pharmaceutical care. Papers reporting primary research focussed on care of the older person within the care home setting were included. No restrictions were placed on methodology. Two researchers independently reviewed titles, abstracts and papers. Agreement on inclusion was reached through consensus. Data on titles, training and activities undertaken were extracted and knowledge requirements identified. Findings were synthesised and reported narratively. KEY

findingsFifty-nine papers were included, most of which were uncontrolled service evaluations. Four papers reported an accreditation process for the pharmacist. Thirteen papers reported providing tools or specific training on a single topic to pharmacists. The main clinical and therapeutic areas of activity (requiring codified knowledge) were dementia, pain, antipsychotic and cardiovascular medication. Provision of pharmaceutical care, effective multidisciplinary working and care home staff training represented the main areas of practical knowledge.

conclusionsInformation regarding training and accreditation processes for care home pharmacists is limited. This study provides insight into potential codified and practical knowledge requirements for pharmacists assuming responsibility for the provision of pharmaceutical care within care homes. Further work involving stakeholders is required to identify the cultural knowledge requirements and to develop a training and accreditation process.

Indexed as

AccreditationNursing HomesPharmaceutical ServicesPharmacistsAgedHumansKnowledgecare homeeducationpharmacistprescribertraining

Identifiers

PMID31713918
PMCPMC7317947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.