ArticleImmunologic research2019
The impact of combining educational program with the improving of infrastructure to diagnose on early detection of primary immunodeficiencies in children.
Article in Immunologic research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exome sequencing in 90 children with developmental delay: a single-center experience.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- The Impact of the Russian Invasion on Healthcare of Patient with Inborn Errors of Immunity and on the Professional Activity of Immunologists in Ukraine.Journal of clinical immunology · 2023Article
- Impact of the J Project on progress of primary immunodeficiency care in Ukraine.Central-European journal of immunology · 2021Review
- Novel compound heterozygous variants in NHLRC2 in a patient with FINCA syndrome.Journal of human genetics · 2020Article
- Article
- The Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction associated with doxycycline in a patient with Lyme arthritis.Reumatologia · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early detection of primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID) is vital for adequate prevention and management of PID infectious complications. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a model combining physician education and public awareness with the infrastructure to diagnose PID to improve its early detection in children. Three approaches were combined and the results were followed from February 2017 to February 2019 in Ternopil region, Ukraine: the education of primary care physicians and other specialists on early PID detection using workshops, trainings, and targeted publications; organization of public events and media appearances to raise PID awareness; performing immunological testing for patients with suspected PID. Among the 150 individuals that were screened, PID was diagnosed in 19 patients (12.7%). The majority of diagnosed PID cases were combined immunodeficiency with associated or syndromic features, followed by antibody deficiencies. Patients referred by the specialist doctors had the highest percentage of confirmed PID compared with those referred by primary care physicians (p = 0.0273) and risk group patients (p = 0.0447). Among warning signs in patients with PID, two or more pneumonias within 1 year occurred most often (26.3%), followed by failure of an infant to gain weight or grow normally (21.1%). Among other signs of PID, dysmorphic features and microcephaly were the most prevalent (31.6%). In conclusion, a program combining physician education and public awareness with infrastructure needed to diagnose primary immunodeficiency diseases is an effective tool for early PID diagnosis. Physician education was a more effective tool compared with rising public awareness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31713829What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.