ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2020
The puzzle of preserved cognition in the oldest old.
Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Declining incidence of Parkinson's disease in Israel (2002-2021).Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Article
- A Scoping Review of Alzheimers Disease Hypotheses: An Array of Uni- and Multi-Factorial Theories.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2024Article
- Why is delirium more frequent in the elderly?Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021Article
- Centenarians, Supercentenarians: We Must Develop New Measurements Suitable for Our Oldest Old.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- An APP mutation family exhibiting white matter hyperintensities and cortical calcification in East China.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although epidemiological studies predict an exponential increase in the prevalence of dementia with age, recent studies have demonstrated that the oldest old are actually less frequently affected by dementia than the younger elderly. To explain this, I suggest a parallel between brain ageing and Alzheimer's disease (AD) and assume that theories concerning the brain's vulnerability to AD and its individual variability may also explain why some of the oldest old remain cognitively efficient. Some theories argue that AD is due to the continuing presence of the immature neurones vulnerable to amyloid beta protein (Aß) that are normally involved in brain development and then removed as a result of cell selection by the proteins associated with both brain development and AD. If a dysfunction in cell selection allows these immature neurones to survive, they degenerate early as a result of the neurotoxic action of Aß accumulation, which their mature counterparts can withstand. Consequently, age at the time of onset of AD and its clinical presentations depend on the number and location of such immature cells. I speculate that the same mechanism is responsible for the variability of normal brain ageing: the oldest old with well-preserved cognitive function are people genetically programmed for extreme ageing who have benefited from better cell selection during prenatal and neonatal life and therefore have fewer surviving neurones vulnerable to amyloid-promoted degeneration, whereas the process of early life cell selection was less successful in the oldest old who develop dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.