Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31713701›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2020

Transpedicular 3D endoscope-assisted thoracic corpectomy for separation surgery in spinal metastases: feasibility of the technique and preliminary results of a promising experience.

Fabio Cofano, Giuseppe Di Perna, Nicola Marengo, Marco Ajello, Antonio Melcarne, Francesco Zenga, Diego Garbossa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Thoracic spine metastases from lung cancer with incomplete paralysis treated by endoscopic spinal surgery: a case report.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Application of the NSE score (Neurology-Stability-Epidural compression assessment) to establish the need for surgery in spinal metastases of elderly patients: a multicenter investigation.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Thoracic Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of spine surgery · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Separation Surgery in the Treatment of Spinal Metastasis.Technology in cancer research & treatment
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fabio CofanoDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. fabio.cofano@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5100-7478
Giuseppe Di PernaDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Nicola MarengoDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Marco AjelloDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Antonio MelcarneDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Francesco ZengaDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Diego GarbossaDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
University of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgery for spinal metastases has undergone multiple transformations in terms of surgical technique. The need for a more aggressive surgical strategy for local control of the disease, given the advances in radiosurgery and immunotherapy, has met the incorporation of many different technological adjuncts. Separation surgery has become one of the main targets to achieve for surgeons in the treatment of spinal metastases. In this paper a prospective series of 3D endoscope-assisted transpedicular thoracic corpectomies is described. Adult patients with a diagnosis of single-level thoracic metastases requiring surgery for epidural compression were included. Data recorded for each case concerned patient demographics, surgical technique, clinical, radiological and surgical data, intra- and postoperative complications, follow-up. The goal of this study was to verify the achievement of separation surgery with this technique, while confirming the safety and feasibility of the procedure. A total number of nine patients were treated from January to April 2019 with a 3D endoscope-assisted procedure. A circumferential bilateral decompression was achieved in seven cases, while monolateral in the other two. A proper separation between the tumor and the spinal cord was achieved in all cases as confirmed by imaging. Axial pain always improved after the procedure as well as neurological functions, when compromised before surgery. No intra-operative and postoperative complications were recorded. Mean hospital stay was 4 days after surgery with early mobilization. At last follow-up no local recurrences were registered. According to preliminary results, the transpedicular 3D endoscope-assisted approach for corpectomies appeared to be a safe and effective technique to achieve proper circumferential decompression and valid separation surgery in thoracic metastases, potentially decreasing the need for costotransversectomy.

Indexed as

EndoscopesThoracic VertebraeAgedDecompression, SurgicalFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresProspective StudiesRadiographySpinal NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeEndoscopic corpectomySeparation surgerySpinal metastasesThoracic spineTranspedicular approach

Identifiers

PMID31713701
OpenAlexW2987367182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.