Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31713665›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2019

[Cardiorespiratory effects of perioperative positioning techniques].

C Zeuzem-Lampert, P Groene, V Brummer, K Hofmann-Kiefer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C Zeuzem-LampertKlinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Nussbaumstr. 20, 80336, München, Deutschland.
P GroeneKlinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Nussbaumstr. 20, 80336, München, Deutschland.
V BrummerKlinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Nussbaumstr. 20, 80336, München, Deutschland.
K Hofmann-KieferKlinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Nussbaumstr. 20, 80336, München, Deutschland. Klaus.Hofmann-Kiefer@med.uni-muenchen.de.
München Klinik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The supine position is still the most frequently used type of positioning during surgical procedures. Positions other than the supine position lead to physiological alterations that have a relevant influence on the course of anesthesia and surgery. As a matter of principle, hemodynamic stability is at risk because venous blood is pooled in the lower positioned body parts. In addition, head down positions (Trendelenburg position) may lead to an impairment of respiratory function by reducing lung volumes as well as lung compliance. Upright positions (beach chair position) are characterized by a relative hypovolemia accompanied by a reduction of mean arterial pressure, cardiac output and stroke volume, whereas pulmonary functions remain unchanged. Some severe adverse events have been described in the literature (e.g. intraoperative apoplexy, postoperative blindness). The pathophysiological principles and effects of hemodynamic alterations as well as potential strategies to avoid complications are presented and discussed in this lead article. Head down positions, especially the Trendelenburg position, cause a relative (intrathoracic) hypervolemia and an increase in cardiac preload that is usually well-tolerated in patients without heart problems; however, the Trendelenburg position, especially if combined with a capnoperitoneum, significantly impairs pulmonary function, can have a negative effect on intracerebral pressure and may reduce blood flow of intra-abdominal organs. The pathophysiological intraoperative changes caused by Trendelenburg positioning are described and approaches suitable for risk reduction are discussed. The prone position and lateral decubitus position have little influence on the intraoperative homeostasis. Nevertheless, there is an ongoing discussion concerning the efficacy of a 15° left lateral position during caesarean section, which is also discussed in a separate section of this review.

Indexed as

Blood PressureCardiac OutputCesarean SectionHead-Down TiltHeart RateHemodynamicsHumansHypovolemiaLung CompliancePatient PositioningProne PositionStroke VolumeBeach chair positionHemodynamicsLung functionSupine positionTrendelenburg position

Identifiers

PMID31713665
OpenAlexW2988699533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.