ArticleHuman brain mapping2020
Neural bases of self- and object-motion in a naturalistic vision.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Optic Flow on Electrocortical Dynamics During Walking and Stepping Over Virtual Obstacles.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Effects of visual cues on scene-relative object motion judgments and concurrent heading estimation from optic flow.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Distinct temporal dynamics of judging scene-relative object motion and estimating heading from optic flow.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Single-Trial fMRI Decoding of 3D Motion with Stereoscopic and Perspective Cues.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Visuo-vestibular integration for self-motion: human cortical area V6 prefers forward and congruent stimuli.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Representation of navigational affordances and ego-motion in the occipital place area.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- A neural mechanism for optic flow parsing in macaque visual cortex.Current biology : CB · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Neural sensitivity to translational self- and object-motion velocities.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Neural correlates of visual and tactile path integration and their task related modulation.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A virtual reality study investigating the train illusion.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Effector-selective modulation of the effective connectivity within frontoparietal circuits during visuomotor tasks.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- EEG analysis of the visual motion activated vection network in left- and right-handers.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Egomotion-related visual areas respond to goal-directed movements.Brain structure & function · 2022Article
- Lower visual field preference for the visuomotor control of limb movements in the human dorsomedial parietal cortex.Brain structure & function · 2021Article
- Cortical visual area CSv as a cingulate motor area: a sensorimotor interface for the control of locomotion.Brain structure & function · 2021Review
- Optic flow selectivity in the macaque parieto-occipital sulcus.Brain structure & function · 2021Article
- Optic flow selectivity in the macaque parieto-occipital sulcus.Brain structure & function · 2021Article
- Resolving visual motion through perceptual gaps.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To plan movements toward objects our brain must recognize whether retinal displacement is due to self-motion and/or to object-motion. Here, we aimed to test whether motion areas are able to segregate these types of motion. We combined an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment, brain mapping techniques, and wide-field stimulation to study the responsivity of motion-sensitive areas to pure and combined self- and object-motion conditions during virtual movies of a train running within a realistic landscape. We observed a selective response in MT to the pure object-motion condition, and in medial (PEc, pCi, CSv, and CMA) and lateral (PIC and LOR) areas to the pure self-motion condition. Some other regions (like V6) responded more to complex visual stimulation where both object- and self-motion were present. Among all, we found that some motion regions (V3A, LOR, MT, V6, and IPSmot) could extract object-motion information from the overall motion, recognizing the real movement of the train even when the images remain still (on the screen), or moved, because of self-movements. We propose that these motion areas might be good candidates for the "flow parsing mechanism," that is the capability to extract object-motion information from retinal motion signals by subtracting out the optic flow components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.