Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31713220›Full record

ArticleNeotropical entomology2019

Manipulation of Agricultural Habitats to Improve Conservation Biological Control in South America.

A Peñalver-Cruz, J K Alvarez-Baca, A Alfaro-Tapia, L Gontijo, B Lavandero

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neotropical entomology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Floral Resource Integration: Enhancing Biocontrol ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Special Section on Biological Control.Neotropical entomology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

A Peñalver-CruzLab de Control Biológico, Instituto de Ciencias Biológicas, Univ de Talca, Avenida Lircay s/n, 3460000, Talca, Chile. ainara.penalver@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-5328
J K Alvarez-BacaLab de Control Biológico, Instituto de Ciencias Biológicas, Univ de Talca, Avenida Lircay s/n, 3460000, Talca, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1373-089X
A Alfaro-TapiaLab de Control Biológico, Instituto de Ciencias Biológicas, Univ de Talca, Avenida Lircay s/n, 3460000, Talca, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9166-9874
L GontijoDept of Management and Conservation of Natural and Agricultural Ecosystems, Univ Federal de Viçosa, Campus Florestal, Viçosa, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6041-7404
B LavanderoLab de Control Biológico, Instituto de Ciencias Biológicas, Univ de Talca, Avenida Lircay s/n, 3460000, Talca, Chile. blavandero@utalca.cl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2423-7016
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Talca · CLUniversidade Federal de Viçosa · BR

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Innovación, Ciencia y Tecnología 21181816fondecyt 1140632Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais FORTIS-TCT-10254/2014universidad de talca nn
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stable and diversified agroecosystems provide farmers with important ecosystem services, which are unfortunately being lost at an alarming rate under the current conventional agriculture framework. Nevertheless, this concern can be tackled by using ecological intensification as an alternative strategy to recuperate ecosystem services (e.g., biological control of pests). To this end, the manipulation of agricultural habitats to enhance natural enemy conservation has been widely explored and reported in Western Europe and North America, whereas in other parts of the world, the investigation of such topic is lagging behind (e.g., South America). In this forum, we gathered published and unpublished information on the different ecological habitat management strategies that have been implemented in South America and their effects on pest control. Additionally, we identify the various challenges and analyze the outlook for the science of conservation biological control in South America. More specifically, we reviewed how different agricultural practices and habitat manipulation in South America have influenced pest management through natural enemy conservation. The main habitat manipulations reported include plant diversification (intercropping, insectary plants, agroforestry), conservation and management of non-crop vegetation, and application of artificial foods. Overall, we noticed that there is a significant discrepancy in the amount of research on conservation biological control among South American countries, and we found that, although intercropping, polycultures, and crop rotation have been reported in agroecosystems since pre-Inca times, more systematic studies are required to evaluate the true effects of habitat management to implement conservation biological control for pest control in South America.

Indexed as

EcosystemPest Control, BiologicalAgricultureAnimalsBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesSouth Americaagricultural diversificationagroecosystemsEcosystem servicesintercroppingnatural enemies

Identifiers

PMID31713220
OpenAlexW2983815103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.