Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31713191›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2020

Results of an educational campaign on stroke awareness in the 2032 Rotary District in Northern-Western Italy.

C Gandolfo, F Alberti, M Del Sette, A Gagliano, N Reale

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Stroke prevention and therapy awareness in a large sample of high school students: results of an educational campaign in the Northern-Western Italy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

C GandolfoClinica Neurologia, Policlinico San Martino, Università di Genova, Largo Paolo Daneo, 16132, Genova, Italy. gandcaci@unige.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4172-8893
F AlbertiAzienda Sanitaria Locale 1, Genova, Liguria, Italy.
M Del SetteEnte Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera, Genova, Italy.
A GaglianoAzienda Ospedaliera Santa Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy.
N RealeClinica Neurologia, Policlinico San Martino, Università di Genova, Largo Paolo Daneo, 16132, Genova, Italy.
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · ITASL Roma · ITAzienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera S.Croce e Carle Cuneo · ITEnte Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera · IT

Funding

Rotary District 2032, Italy Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople often ignore the usefulness of stroke prevention, the typical onset symptoms, and the efficacy of the new therapies. In order to attempt to correct this situation, we performed an educational campaign addressed to Rotary club associates and their relatives or friends in the Italian Rotary District 2032.

methodThe campaign consisted in three phases: (1) Compilation of a simple questionnaire on stroke, followed by a scientific relation on the disease, distribution of didactic materials, and organization of screening sessions on individual stroke risk evaluation; (2) Recompilation by participants of the same previous questionnaire; (3) Statistical evaluation of the improvement of stroke knowledge.

resultsThe initial percentage of wrong answers (number of subjects 657) was 22.41% ((A) stroke general knowledge 15.45%; (B) stroke risk factors 25.65%; (C) Stroke early symptoms 22.65%). At the end of the campaign, the total percentage of wrong answers (number of subjects 296) attained the 13.18% ((A) stroke general knowledge 8.22%; (B) stroke risk factors 14.98%; (C) stroke early symptoms 13.85%). All these differences were strongly significant at the statistical analysis. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionWe demonstrated that our educational campaign obtained an important improvement of stroke awareness in our sample. We hope that the enhanced awareness might induce a more frequent diffusion of primary prevention strategies, an increased capacity of recognizing onset stroke symptoms with shortening of patients' presentation in the Emergency Room of the hospitals when they can undergo thrombolysis/thrombectomy.

Indexed as

AwarenessHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsStrokeSurveys and QuestionnairesAwarenessDistrict 2032Educational projectInformation campaignRotaryStroke

Identifiers

PMID31713191
OpenAlexW2988365195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.