Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31713179›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2019

Effects of Diabetes on Bone Material Properties.

Sashank Lekkala, Erik A Taylor, Heather B Hunt, Eve Donnelly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bone Fragility: Time to Address the Matrix.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Long-duration type 1 diabetes is associated with deficient cortical bone mechanical behavior and altered matrix composition in human femoral bone.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sashank LekkalaDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Erik A TaylorSibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Heather B HuntDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Eve DonnellyDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. eve.donnelly@cornell.edu.

Funding

Nonenzymatic glycation, bone quality, and microdamage in type 2 diabetic boneK01AR064314 · NIAMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI DONNELLY, EVE · 2013 to 2017
$659k
NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR064314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIndividuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM, T2DM) have an increased risk of bone fracture compared to non-diabetic controls that is not explained by differences in BMD, BMI, or falls. Thus, bone tissue fracture resistance may be reduced in individuals with DM. The purpose of this review is to summarize work that analyzes the effects of T1DM and T2DM on bone tissue compositional and mechanical properties. RECENT

findingsStudies of clinical T2DM specimens revealed increased mineralization and advanced glycation endproduct (AGE) concentrations and significant relationships between mechanical performance and composition of cancellous bone. Specifically, in femoral cancellous tissue, compressive stiffness and strength increased with mineral content; and post-yield properties decreased with AGE concentration. In addition, cortical resistance to in vivo indentation (bone material strength index) was lower in patients with T2DM vs. age-matched non-diabetic controls, and this resistance decreased with worsening glycemic control. Recent studies on patients with T1DM and history of a prior fragility fracture found greater mineral content and concentrations of AGEs in iliac trabecular bone and correspondingly stiffer, harder bone at the nanosacle. Recent observational data showed greater AGE and mineral content in surgically retrieved bone from patients with T2DM vs. non-DM controls, consistent with reduced bone remodeling. Limited data on human T1DM bone tissue also showed higher mineral and AGE content in patients with prior fragility fractures compared to non-DM and non-fracture controls.

Indexed as

Bone RemodelingAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBlood GlucoseBone and BonesBone DensityCancellous BoneCortical BoneDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Fractures, BoneGlycation End Products, AdvancedHumansBlood GlucoseGlycation End Products, AdvancedAdvanced glycation end products (AGEs)Bone material propertiesDiabetic murine modelsIn vitro glycationType 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM)Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)

Identifiers

PMID31713179
PMCPMC6986388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.