Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31713144›Full record

ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2019

Nature-Based Social Prescribing in Urban Settings to Improve Social Connectedness and Mental Well-being: a Review.

M A Leavell, J A Leiferman, M Gascon, F Braddick, J C Gonzalez, J S Litt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current environmental health reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Testing nature-based biopsychosocial resilience theory: a research programme protocol.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. "Awe-scillations": EEG spectral and complexity representations of awe.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M A LeavellUniversity of Colorado Boulder, 4001 Discovery Drive, Boulder, CO, 80303, USA.
J A LeifermanColorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, USA.
M GasconISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.
F BraddickAgència de Salut Pública de Catalunya (ASPCAT), Barcelona, Spain.
J C GonzalezAgència de Salut Pública de Catalunya (ASPCAT), Barcelona, Spain.
J S LittUniversity of Colorado Boulder, 4001 Discovery Drive, Boulder, CO, 80303, USA. jill.litt@colorado.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewRecent reports of a "loneliness epidemic" in the USA are growing along with a robust evidence base that suggests that loneliness and social isolation can compromise physical and psychological health. Screening for social isolation among at-risk populations and referring them to nature-based community services, resources, and activities through a social prescribing (SP) program may provide a way to connect vulnerable populations with the broader community and increase their sense of connectedness and belonging. In this review, we explore opportunities for social prescribing to be used as a tool to address connectedness through nature-based interventions. RECENT

findingsSocial prescribing can include a variety of activities linked with voluntary and community sector organizations (e.g., walking and park prescriptions, community gardening, farmers' market vouchers). These activities can promote nature contact, strengthen social structures, and improve longer term mental and physical health by activating intrapersonal, interpersonal, and environmental processes. The prescriptions are appropriate for reaching a range of high-risk populations including moms who are minors who are minors, recent immigrants, older adults, economically and linguistically isolated populations, and unlikely users of nature and outdoor spaces. More research is needed to understand the impact of SPs on high-risk populations and the supports needed to allow them to feel at ease in the outdoors. Additionally, opportunities exist to develop technologically and socially innovative strategies to track patient participation in social prescriptions, monitor impact over time, and integrate prescribing into standard health care practice.

Indexed as

AdultAgedGardeningHumansLonelinessMental HealthMiddle AgedRecreationRelaxation TherapySocial IsolationUrban PopulationWalkingYoung AdultLonelinessNature-basedPsychosocial processesSocial connectednessSocial isolationSocial prescriptions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.